DocumentCode
737472
Title
Impact of Self Noise on Tracking Performance of Non-Data-Aided Digital Timing Recovery
Author
Scardoni, Federica ; Magarini, Maurizio ; Spalvieri, Arnaldo
Author_Institution
Alcatel-Lucent, Vimercate, Italy
Volume
33
Issue
18
fYear
2015
Firstpage
3755
Lastpage
3762
Abstract
Non-data-aided feedforward timing recovery is preferred to non-data-aided feedback timing recovery in digital receivers because it does not suffer delay in the loop. However, while feedback timing recovery with optimized predetection filter is not affected by self noise, in this paper it is pointed out for the first time that, even if an optimized predetection filter is adopted, feedforward timing recovery is. The paper proposes an approximation to the power spectral density of self noise that leads to analytical performance evaluation, the accuracy of the approximation being confirmed by simulation results. Also, a comparative study of feedforward and feedback timing recovery is presented. The result of the comparison is that, for signal-to-noise ratio lower than 50 dB and realistic spectra of phase noise affecting the timing wave to be tracked, despite self noise, feedforward timing recovery outperforms feedback timing recovery.
Keywords
optical filters; optical information processing; optical receivers; phase noise; synchronisation; timing jitter; analytical performance evaluation; digital receivers; loop; nondata-aided digital timing recovery; nondata-aided feedback timing recovery; nondata-aided feedforward timing recovery; optimized predetection filter; phase noise; power spectral density; self noise; signal-to-noise ratio; timing wave; tracking performance; Approximation methods; Detectors; Feedforward neural networks; Phase noise; Signal to noise ratio; Timing; Clock recovery; phase noise; self noise; synchronization; timing jitter;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Lightwave Technology, Journal of
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0733-8724
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/JLT.2015.2452313
Filename
7147780
Link To Document