DocumentCode :
740389
Title :
Estimation of Forest Biomass From Two-Level Model Inversion of Single-Pass InSAR Data
Author :
Soja, Maciej Jerzy ; Persson, Henrik J. ; Ulander, Lars M. H.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Earth & Space Sci., Chalmers Univ. of Technol., Gothenburg, Sweden
Volume :
53
Issue :
9
fYear :
2015
Firstpage :
5083
Lastpage :
5099
Abstract :
A model for aboveground biomass estimation from single-pass interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data is presented. Forest height and canopy density estimates Δh and η0, respectively, obtained from two-level model (TLM) inversion, are used as biomass predictors. Eighteen bistatic VV-polarized TanDEM-X (TDM) acquisitions are used, made over two Swedish test sites in the summers of 2011, 2012, and 2013 (nominal incidence angle: 41°; height-of-ambiguity: 32-63 m) . Remningstorp features a hemiboreal forest in southern Sweden, with flat topography and where 32 circular plots have been sampled between 2010 and 2011 (area: 0.5 ha; biomass: 42-242 t/ha; height: 14-32 m) . Krycklan features a boreal forest in northern Sweden, 720-km north-northeast from Remningstorp, with significant topography and where 31 stands have been sampled in 2008 (area: 2.4-26.3 ha; biomass: 23-183 t/ha; height: 7-21 m) . A high-resolution digital terrain model has been used as ground reference during InSAR processing. For the aforementioned plots and stands and if the same acquisition is used for model training and validation, the new model explains 65%-89% of the observed variance, with root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 12%-19% (median: 15%) . By fixing two of the three model parameters, accurate biomass estimation can also be done when different acquisitions or different test sites are used for model training and validation, with RMSE of 12%-56% (median: 17%) . Compared with a simple scaling model computing biomass from the phase center elevation above ground, the proposed model shows significantly better performance in Remningstorp, as it accounts for the large canopy density variations caused by active management. In Krycklan, the two models show similar performance.
Keywords :
data acquisition; digital elevation models; forestry; radar interferometry; remote sensing by radar; synthetic aperture radar; vegetation; AD 2008; AD 2010; AD 2011; AD 2012; AD 2013; InSAR processing; Krycklan feature; Remningstorp feature; Swedish test site; VV-polarized TanDEM-X acquisition; aboveground biomass estimation; biomass predictor; canopy density; digital terrain model; forest biomass estimation; forest height; hemiboreal forest; northern Sweden; single-pass InSAR data; single-pass interferometric synthetic aperture radar data; southern Sweden; two-level model inversion; Biological system modeling; Biomass; Computational modeling; Correlation; Decorrelation; Estimation; Synthetic aperture radar; Aboveground biomass (AGB); TanDEM-X (TDM); canopy density; forest height; interferometric model; interferometric syntheticaperture radar (InSAR); two-level model (TLM);
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0196-2892
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TGRS.2015.2417205
Filename :
7094294
Link To Document :
بازگشت