DocumentCode
744282
Title
Performance Comparison of Offset-16QAM and 16QAM for Nyquist WDM Superchannel With Digital Spectral Shaping
Author
Meng Xiang ; Haoyuan Tang ; Songnian Fu ; Ming Tang ; Shum, Perry ; Deming Liu
Author_Institution
Nat. Eng. Lab. for Next Generation Internet Access Syst., Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Wuhan, China
Volume
33
Issue
17
fYear
2015
Firstpage
3623
Lastpage
3629
Abstract
We investigate five-channel polarization division multiplexed Nyquist WDM superchannel using offset-16QAM and 16QAM modulation format, under the condition of transmitter-side digital spectral shaping technique, respectively. The offset-16QAM scheme can greatly relax the implementation complexity, because the tap number of 35 is sufficient for the required finite impulse response (FIR) filter, compared with 81-tap FIR filter of the 16QAM scheme. About 1.3-dB back-to-back sensitivity improvement is obtained for the offset-16QAM scheme. In particular, the offset-16QAM scheme has better tolerance of DACs´ constraints, including the untracked jitter, sampling rate, and resolution. Finally, the practical implementation of offset-16QAM-based Nyquist WDM superchannel with TS-DSS is evaluated, by taking the phase difference deviation among wavelength channels and phase noise into account. No more than 1.3-dB required-OSNR penalty can be obtained, in case the phase difference is varied from 0° to 360°. When the laser with a linewidth of 100 kHz is used, there still exists about 1-dB overall performance improvement, compared with the 16QAM scheme.
Keywords
FIR filters; communication complexity; light polarisation; optical filters; optical modulation; optical transmitters; phase noise; quadrature amplitude modulation; telecommunication channels; wavelength division multiplexing; 16QAM modulation format; DAC constraint tolerance; FIR filter; OSNR penalty; back-back sensitivity improvement; digital-analog converter; finite impulse response filter; five-channel polarization division multiplexed Nyquist WDM superchannel; implementation complexity; offset-16QAM modulation format; phase difference deviation; phase noise; sampling rate; tap number; transmitter-side digital spectral shaping; untracked jitter; wavelength channels; Adaptive equalizers; Bandwidth; Finite impulse response filters; Modulation; Optical filters; Optical noise; Wavelength division multiplexing; Digital to analog converter; Nyquist WDM; digital to analog converter; finite impulse response filter; offset-QAM modulation;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Lightwave Technology, Journal of
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0733-8724
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/JLT.2015.2448117
Filename
7130563
Link To Document