Title :
Reply by S.F. Mahmoud [to \´Comments on "Calculated channel characteristics of a braided coaxial cable in a mine tunnel" \´]
Author_Institution :
Cairo Univ.,Giza,Egypt
fDate :
10/1/1976 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
SUmmary form only given, as follows. The comments of Prof. Delogne on our paper ("Calculated channel characteristics of a braided coaxial cable in a mine tunnel") seem very appropriate and instructive. I do agree with Prof. Delogne that at low frequencies, questions related to the receiver noise and perhaps the receiver matching become of primary importance. The coupling loss in the aforementioned paper is actually related only to the mutual impedance between the transmitting and receiving antennas but does not include the input resistances of these antennas. This drawback has been repaired in the paper "Calculated transmission loss for a leaky feeder communication systems in a circular tunnel" by Hill and Wait (1976). However, by limiting the antenna input resistance to a certain minimum value at the lower frequencies, the two definitions of the coupling loss in our papers become identical (within a constant). It is interesting to notice that both papers confirm the result that the coupling loss is a very slowly varying function of frequency for frequencies less than about 35 MHz. This is so in spite of the different approaches used in the two papers. Specifically, the coupling loss in Mahmoud and Wait\´s paper is obtained without assigning any particular location or orientation of the antennas; hence, it can be considered as some kind of average coupling loss over various locations and orientations.
Keywords :
Business; Communications Society; Frequency; Impedance; Low-frequency noise; Mutual coupling; Propagation losses; Receiving antennas; Transfer functions; Transmitting antennas;
Journal_Title :
Communications, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TCOM.1976.1093229