DocumentCode
77424
Title
Quantifying Admissible Undersampling for Sparsity-Exploiting Iterative Image Reconstruction in X-Ray CT
Author
Jorgensen, J.S. ; Sidky, Emil Y. ; Pan, Xing
Author_Institution
Dept. of Inf. & Math. Modeling, Tech. Univ. of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Volume
32
Issue
2
fYear
2013
fDate
Feb. 2013
Firstpage
460
Lastpage
473
Abstract
Iterative image reconstruction with sparsity-exploiting methods, such as total variation (TV) minimization, investigated in compressive sensing claim potentially large reductions in sampling requirements. Quantifying this claim for computed tomography (CT) is nontrivial, because both full sampling in the discrete-to-discrete imaging model and the reduction in sampling admitted by sparsity-exploiting methods are ill-defined. The present article proposes definitions of full sampling by introducing four sufficient-sampling conditions (SSCs). The SSCs are based on the condition number of the system matrix of a linear imaging model and address invertibility and stability. In the example application of breast CT, the SSCs are used as reference points of full sampling for quantifying the undersampling admitted by reconstruction through TV-minimization. In numerical simulations, factors affecting admissible undersampling are studied. Differences between few-view and few-detector bin reconstruction as well as a relation between object sparsity and admitted undersampling are quantified.
Keywords
compressed sensing; computerised tomography; image reconstruction; iterative methods; mammography; medical image processing; X-ray CT; breast CT; compressive sensing; computed tomography; discrete-to-discrete imaging model; few-detector bin reconstruction; few-view bin reconstruction; linear imaging model; sparsity-exploiting iterative image reconstruction; sufficient-sampling conditions; total variation minimization; undersampling; Computed tomography; Data models; Detectors; Image reconstruction; Transforms; X-ray imaging; Compressed sensing (CS); computed tomography (CT); data models; image sampling; iterative methods; Algorithms; Artifacts; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Reproducibility of Results; Sample Size; Sensitivity and Specificity; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Tomography, X-Ray Computed;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0062
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMI.2012.2230185
Filename
6362226
Link To Document