Title :
High reliability prototype quadrupole for the Next Linear Collider
Author :
Rago, Carl E. ; Spencer, Cherrill M. ; Wolf, Zachary ; Yocky, Gerald
Author_Institution :
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, USA
fDate :
3/1/2002 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
The Next Linear Collider (NLC) will require over 5600 magnets, each of which must be highly reliable and/or quickly repairable in order that the NLC reach its 85% overall availability goal. A multidiscipline engineering team was assembled at SLAC to develop a more reliable electromagnet design than historically had been achieved at SLAC. This team carried out a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) on a standard SLAC quadrupole magnet system. They overcame a number of long standing design prejudices, producing 10 major design changes. This paper describes how a prototype magnet was constructed and the extensive testing carried out on it to prove full functionality with an improvement in reliability. The magnet´s fabrication cost will be compared to the cost of a magnet with the same requirements made in the historic SLAC way. The NLC will use over 1600 of these 12.7 mm bore quadrupoles with a range of integrated strengths from 0.6 to 132 Tesla, a maximum gradient of 135 Tesla per meter, an adjustment range of 0 to -20% and core lengths from 324 mm to 972 mm. The magnetic center must remain stable to within 1 micron during the 20% adjustment. A magnetic measurement set-up has been developed that can measure sub-micron shifts of a magnetic center. The prototype satisfied the center shift requirement over the full range of integrated strengths.
Keywords :
accelerator magnets; failure analysis; linear colliders; particle beam diagnostics; reliability; superconducting magnets; 0.6 to 132 T; 12.7 mm; 324 to 972 mm; FMEA; NLC; Next Linear Collider; failure mode and effects analysis; high reliability prototype quadrupole; magnetic measurement set-up; multidiscipline engineering team; prototype magnet; reliability; superconducting magnets; Assembly; Availability; Costs; Design engineering; Electromagnets; Failure analysis; Magnetic analysis; Magnets; Prototypes; Reliability engineering;
Journal_Title :
Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TASC.2002.1018398