DocumentCode
787487
Title
New Jersey federal court holds Qualcomm´s unFRANDly acts no antitrust violation
Author
Stern, Richard
Volume
26
Issue
5
fYear
2006
Firstpage
9
Lastpage
85
Abstract
In the last few months, two federal tribunals have reached opposite results in determining whether alleged playing fast and loose with the operations of a standard-setting organization (SSO) violates the antitrust laws. In the New Jersey case, Broadcom Corp., a manufacturer of chipsets for communications applications, sued Qualcomm Inc., another chipset manufacturer and the owner of patents essential to complying with the Universal Mobile Telephone System (UMTS) standard. Broadcom charged that Qualcomm deceived US and international SSOs into incorporating Qualcomm´s patented technology into the UMTS standard by making intentionally false representations that it would license its patents on FRAND terms
Keywords
3G mobile communication; legislation; microprocessor chips; patents; radiotelephony; telecommunication standards; Broadcom Corporation; FRAND terms; New Jersey federal court; Qualcomm Incorporation; UMTS standard; Universal Mobile Telephone System; chipset manufacturer; patents; standard-setting organization; 3G mobile communication; Law; Licenses; Manufacturing; Mobile communication; Monopoly; Random access memory; Standardization; Standards organizations; Telephony; Broadcom; Qualcomm; antitrust law;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Micro, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0272-1732
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MM.2006.97
Filename
1709817
Link To Document