• DocumentCode
    788586
  • Title

    Announcements on the PES Web Site

  • Volume
    22
  • Issue
    12
  • fYear
    2002
  • Firstpage
    6
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    The conversion of a one-player power sector (i.e., a natural monopoly) into a multiple-players power market brings not only benefits of competition but also the costs of complexity to the consumers. Between the two, an optimal number of players is found, corresponding to the minimum price of power to the consumers. Considering time as the third dimension, the optimum curve becomes a potential surface on which the evolution of the market entities is seen as oscillations (mergers and unbundling) along the valley of minimum price. Every oscillation triggers a price burst, which is detrimental to the consumers. To avoid this, the role of the regulator is better defined in the sense of smoothing the transition from monopoly to market. The example of the US and of the EU power sectors´ evolution is relevant here. In the above approach, long-range competition resulting from the future opening of power markets in Europe or from the penetration, 70 years ago, of the interconnection technology in the USA, is compared with the short-range (local) competition.
  • Keywords
    costing; power markets; power system economics; tariffs; Europe; USA; competition; complexity costs; interconnection technology; long-range competition; mergers; minimum power price; minimum price; multiple-players power market; one-player power sector; power industry deregulation; unbundling; Australia; Chaos; Corporate acquisitions; Cost function; Europe; Monopoly; Power industry; Power markets; Regulators; Smoothing methods;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Power Engineering Review, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0272-1724
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MPER.2002.1098045
  • Filename
    1098045