Title :
Comparison of the Performance of Linear Multivariate Analysis Methods for Normal and Dyplasia Tissues Differentiation Using Autofluorescence Spectroscopy
Author :
Shou Chia Chu ; Tzu-Chien Ryan Hsiao ; Lin, J.K. ; Chih-Yu Wang ; Chiang, H.K.
Author_Institution :
Inst. of Biomed. Eng., Nat. Yang-Ming Univ., Taipei
Abstract :
We compared the performance of three widely used linear multivariate methods for autofluorescence spectroscopic tissues differentiation. Principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS), and multivariate linear regression (MVLR) were compared for differentiating at normal, tubular adenoma/epithelial dysplasia and cancer in colorectal and oral tissues. The methods´ performances were evaluated by cross-validation analysis. The group-averaged predictive diagnostic accuracies were 85% (PCA), 90% (PLS), and 89% (MVLR) for colorectal tissues; 89% (PCA), 90% (PLS), and 90% (MVLR) for oral tissues. This study found that both PLS and MVLR achieved higher diagnostic results than did PCA
Keywords :
bio-optics; cancer; fluorescence spectroscopy; least squares approximations; patient diagnosis; principal component analysis; regression analysis; tumours; MVLR; PCA; PLS; autofluorescence spectroscopy; cancer; colorectal tissues; cross-validation analysis; dysplasia tissues; epithelial dysplasia; group-averaged predictive diagnostic accuracies; linear multivariate analysis; multivariate linear regression; normal tissues; oral tissues; partial least squares; principal component analysis; tissue differentiation; tubular adenoma; Biomedical engineering; Biomedical measurements; Cancer; Fluorescence; Least squares methods; Linear regression; Pathology; Performance analysis; Principal component analysis; Spectroscopy; Colorectal tissue; light-induced autofluorescence; multivariate linear regression; oral tissue; partial least squares; principal component analysis; Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Humans; Linear Models; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasms; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrometry, Fluorescence;
Journal_Title :
Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TBME.2006.883643