DocumentCode
801658
Title
Feedback control system synthesis for plants with large parameter variations
Author
Rolnik, Jerry A. ; Horowitz, Isaac M.
Author_Institution
Hughes Aircraft Company, Canoga Park, CA, USA
Volume
14
Issue
6
fYear
1969
fDate
12/1/1969 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
714
Lastpage
718
Abstract
A synthesis procedure is developed for a dominant third-order system (as opposed to the usual dominant second-order system) where the size of the complex closed-loop pole region is not specifically restricted but is contained within a circular boundary. The plant considered is of third order, with a real pole at the origin and a pair of complex poles with negative real parts. The added real pole affords an additional degree of freedom with which to meet the system-time domain specifications. The compensation prescribed is a biquadratic network with complex zeros, and compensation poles are constrained to exhibit only second-order effects. The procedure is based on the association of the desired closed-loop pole parameter values with open-loop parameter values in the (
) plane, which is in actuality the natural-frequency-squared damping-constant plane. A constant gain factor is assumed, but this constraint may be removed if a tandem gain control system is employed. This assures that the gain variations are much slower than the system response. Relations between the desired nominal closed-loop poles and the plant region and compensation locations are derived for a prescribed circular closed-loop pole region. The nominal plant pole location is a design specification, while the allowable plant region depends on the closed-loop pole location and region, i.e., a change in size of one region is reflected as a proportional change in size of the plant closed-loop pole region. The remote compensation pole location is primarily determined by minimizing transient distortion while ensuring a specified degree of stability.
) plane, which is in actuality the natural-frequency-squared damping-constant plane. A constant gain factor is assumed, but this constraint may be removed if a tandem gain control system is employed. This assures that the gain variations are much slower than the system response. Relations between the desired nominal closed-loop poles and the plant region and compensation locations are derived for a prescribed circular closed-loop pole region. The nominal plant pole location is a design specification, while the allowable plant region depends on the closed-loop pole location and region, i.e., a change in size of one region is reflected as a proportional change in size of the plant closed-loop pole region. The remote compensation pole location is primarily determined by minimizing transient distortion while ensuring a specified degree of stability.Keywords
Feedback systems; Boron; Control system synthesis; Feedback control; Functional analysis; Inductors; Integral equations; Nonlinear equations; Optimal control; Poles and zeros; Stochastic processes;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9286
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TAC.1969.1099306
Filename
1099306
Link To Document