• DocumentCode
    803199
  • Title

    A pseudodifferential amplifier for bioelectric events with DC-offset compensation using two-wired amplifying electrodes

  • Author

    Degen, Thomas ; Jäckel, Heinz

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. Technol. & Electr. Engeering, Swiss Fed. Inst. of Technol., Zurich, Switzerland
  • Volume
    53
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2006
  • Firstpage
    300
  • Lastpage
    310
  • Abstract
    Most wired active electrodes reported so far have a gain of one and require at least three wires. This leads to stiff cables, large connectors and additional noise for the amplifier. The theoretical advantages of amplifying the signal on the electrodes right from the source has often been described, however, rarely implemented. This is because a difference in the gain of the electrodes due to component tolerances strongly limits the achievable common mode rejection ratio (CMRR). In this paper, we introduce an amplifier for bioelectric events where the major part of the amplification (40 dB) is achieved on the electrodes to minimize pick-up noise. The electrodes require only two wires of which one can be used for shielding, thus enabling smaller connecters and smoother cables. Saturation of the electrodes is prevented by a dc-offset cancelation scheme with an active range of ±250 mV. This error feedback simultaneously allows to measure the low frequency components down to dc. This enables the measurement of slow varying signals, e.g., the change of alertness or the depolarization before an epileptic seizure normally not visible in a standard electroencephalogram (EEG). The amplifier stage provides the necessary supply current for the electrodes and generates the error signal for the feedback loop. The amplifier generates a pseudodifferential signal where the amplified bioelectric event is present on one lead, but the common mode signal is present on both leads. Based on the pseudodifferential signal we were able to develop a new method to compensate for a difference in the gain of the active electrodes which is purely software based. The amplifier system is then characterized and the input referred noise as well as the CMRR are measured. For the prototype circuit the CMRR evaluated to 78 dB (without the driven-right-leg circuit). The applicability of the system is further demonstrated by the recording of an ECG.
  • Keywords
    bioelectric phenomena; biomedical electrodes; differential amplifiers; diseases; electrocardiography; feedback; 40 dB; 78 dB; DC-offset compensation; ECG; bioelectric events; common mode rejection ratio; electrocardiogram; error feedback; pseudodifferential amplifier; two-wired amplifying electrodes; Bioelectric phenomena; Cables; Circuits; Connectors; Electrodes; Feedback; Low-frequency noise; Noise cancellation; Signal generators; Wires; Amplifying electrodes; bioelectric recordings; common mode rejection; dc-offset compensation; instrumentation amplifier; Amplifiers; Computer-Aided Design; Electrocardiography; Electrodes; Equipment Design; Equipment Failure Analysis; Humans; Miniaturization; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9294
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TBME.2005.862531
  • Filename
    1580836