DocumentCode
806919
Title
The value of the VaNTH Engineering Research Center
Author
Cordray, David S. ; Pion, Georgine M. ; Harris, Alene ; Norris, Patrick
Volume
22
Issue
4
fYear
2003
Firstpage
47
Lastpage
54
Abstract
Established in 1999 with a grant from the National Science Foundation, the Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT Engineering Research Center (VaNTH/ERC) for Bioengineering Educational Technologies is aimed at improving the short- and long-term outcomes of bioengineering education at many levels with a particular emphasis on undergraduates. As part of the VaNTH ERC, there is a sizable emphasis on assessment and evaluation (A&E). This article focuses on a subset of A&E activities - those directed at estimating the relative effects or "value added" for individual VaNTH projects on student learning and expertise. At the core of the VaNTH ERC is the development of innovative modules that are used in BME courses. These innovative projects are based on the principles of learning within the How People Learn model. Over the course of VaNTH\´s eight-year time line, at least 100 project-level modules or courses will be subjected to empirical assessment and evaluation. Procedures have been developed to conduct a quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) of effects within and across VaNTH sites. This article describes the use of a counterfactual model of causal analysis that is being used to evaluate the value added for VaNTH activities at the project level. Preliminary results are presented to illustrate how these A&E activities are being undertaken. In doing so, challenges that have been encountered and resolutions to technical and practical problems also are discussed.
Keywords
biomedical education; educational courses; project engineering; statistical analysis; Bioengineering Educational Technologies; How People Learn model; VaNTH Engineering Research Center; assessment and evaluation; bioengineering education; causal analysis; counterfactual model; courses; empirical assessment; individual VaNTH projects; innovative modules; learning principles; long-term outcomes; meta-analysis; practical problems; project level; project-level modules; quantitative synthesis; relative effects; short-term outcomes; statistical technique; student learning; technical problems; undergraduates; value added; Biomedical engineering; Engineering in medicine and biology; Feedback; Mesons; Problem-solving; Statistical analysis; Technological innovation; Testing; Biomedical Engineering; Cooperative Behavior; Curriculum; Education, Professional; Interinstitutional Relations; Learning; Models, Educational; Teaching; Teaching Materials; United States; Universities;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0739-5175
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MEMB.2003.1237491
Filename
1237491
Link To Document