DocumentCode :
86755
Title :
Architectural Considerations in the Design of a Superconducting Quantum Annealing Processor
Author :
Bunyk, P.I. ; Hoskinson, Emile M. ; Johnson, Mark W. ; Tolkacheva, Elena ; Altomare, Fabio ; Berkley, Andrew J. ; Harris, Roy ; Hilton, J.P. ; Lanting, Trevor ; Przybysz, Anthony J. ; Whittaker, Jed
Author_Institution :
D-Wave Syst. Inc., Burnaby, BC, Canada
Volume :
24
Issue :
4
fYear :
2014
fDate :
Aug. 2014
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
10
Abstract :
We have developed a quantum annealing processor, based on an array of tunable coupled rf-SQUID flux qubits, fabricated in a superconducting integrated circuit process. Implementing this type of processor at a scale of 512 qubits and 1472 programmable interqubit couplers and operating at ~ 20 mK has required attention to a number of considerations that one may ignore at the smaller scale of a few dozen or so devices. Here, we discuss some of these considerations, and the delicate balance necessary for the construction of a practical processor that respects the demanding physical requirements imposed by a quantum algorithm. In particular, we will review some of the design tradeoffs at play in the floor planning of the physical layout, driven by the desire to have an algorithmically useful set of interqubit couplers, and the simultaneous need to embed programmable control circuitry into the processor fabric. In this context, we have developed a new ultralow-power embedded superconducting digital-to-analog flux converter (DAC) used to program the processor with zero static power dissipation, optimized to achieve maximum flux storage density per unit area. The 512 single-stage, 3520 two-stage, and 512 three-stage flux DACs are controlled with an XYZ addressing scheme requiring 56 wires. Our estimate of on-chip dissipated energy for worst-case reprogramming of the whole processor is ~ 65 fJ. Several chips based on this architecture have been fabricated and operated successfully at our facility, as well as two outside facilities (see, for example, the recent reporting by Jones).
Keywords :
SQUIDs; circuit analysis computing; digital-analogue conversion; integrated circuit layout; program processors; programmable circuits; quantum computing; superconducting processor circuits; XYZ addressing scheme; architectural considerations; maximum flux storage density; on-chip dissipated energy; physical layout; processor fabric; programmable control circuitry; programmable interqubit couplers; quantum algorithm; single-stage flux DAC; superconducting integrated circuit process; superconducting quantum annealing processor; three-stage flux DAC; tunable coupled rf-SQUID flux qubits; two-stage flux DAC; ultralow-power embedded superconducting digital-to-analog flux converter; worst-case reprogramming; zero static power dissipation; Annealing; Couplers; Couplings; Hardware; Network architecture; Quantum processors; Topology; Computational physics; quantum computing; superconducting integrated circuits;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1051-8223
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TASC.2014.2318294
Filename :
6802426
Link To Document :
بازگشت