DocumentCode :
87526
Title :
Energy Storage That May Be Too Good to Be True: Comparison Between Wayside Storage and Reversible Thyristor Controlled Rectifiers for Heavy Rail
Author :
Gelman, Vitaly
Volume :
8
Issue :
4
fYear :
2013
fDate :
Dec. 2013
Firstpage :
70
Lastpage :
80
Abstract :
There has been substantial interest in the traction community for using wayside energy storage systems (ESSs) to better use train braking energy, thus reducing energy costs and peak power as well as voltage stabilization. An alternative solution to reach the same goals is using recuperating (also called reversible) traction power substations such as reversible thyristor controlled rectifiers (RTCRs). This article compares advantages and disadvantages of ESSs of three most common types-flywheels, batteries, and supercapacitors-and recuperating substations. The analysis takes into account size, capital cost, the "round trip" energy losses, and energy savings for heavy rail applications.
Keywords :
battery powered vehicles; braking; cost reduction; flywheels; railway electrification; rectifier substations; supercapacitors; thyristor applications; traction power supplies; voltage regulators; RTCR; account size; batteries; called reversible traction power substations; capital cost; energy cost reduction; flywheels; heavy rail applications; peak power reduction; recuperating traction power substations; reversible thyristor controlled rectifiers; round trip energy losses; supercapacitors; traction community; train braking energy; voltage stabilization; wayside energy storage systems; Acceleration; Batteries; Energy storage; Rectifiers; Substations; Supercapacitors; Thyristors;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Vehicular Technology Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1556-6072
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/MVT.2013.2283350
Filename :
6658850
Link To Document :
بازگشت