Title :
Qualifying commercial ICs for space total-dose environments
Author :
Sexton, F.W. ; Fleetwood, D.M. ; Aldridge, C.C. ; Garrett, G. ; Pelletier, J.C. ; Gaona, J.I., Jr.
Author_Institution :
Sandia Nat. Labs., Albuquerque, NM, USA
fDate :
12/1/1992 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
A test protocol based on MIL-STD-883D, Test Method 1019.4, which includes a room-temperature biased anneal following irradiation, is shown to predict device response to low-dose-rate irradiations more accurately than the present standard. Failure dose was measured with three test protocols: with Method 1019.4, with Method 1019.4 plus a room-temperature anneal, and with 0.2 rad(Si)/s irradiations at static and dynamic bias. In comparing the power-supply current (IDD) of two commercial field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), it was found that the failure dose for devices with a high annealing rate increased by a factor of ten times when a room-temperature anneal was included, while devices with a slower annealing rate showed almost a two-times improvement in failure dose. Slower-annealing devices showed a higher failure dose when dynamically biased during low dose-rate irradiations, indicating that radiation-induced charge neutralization accelerated recovery in these devices. Methods of characterizing the hardness of MOS ICs using a test flow that includes room-temperature and elevated-temperature anneals are discussed
Keywords :
CMOS integrated circuits; aerospace instrumentation; annealing; integrated circuit testing; logic arrays; logic testing; military standards; radiation effects; radiation hardening (electronics); CMOS devices; MIL-STD-883D, Test Method 1019.4; commercial IC qualification; device response; field-programmable gate arrays; low-dose-rate irradiations; radiation hardness assurance; radiation-induced charge neutralization; room-temperature biased anneal; space total-dose environments; test protocol; Acceleration; Annealing; Contracts; Field programmable gate arrays; Laboratories; Protocols; Space technology; Temperature; Testing; Yield estimation;
Journal_Title :
Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on