Title :
A comparative evaluation of four basic system-level diagnosis strategies for hypercubes
Author :
Kavianpour, A. ; Kim, K.H.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., California Univ., Irvine, CA, USA
fDate :
3/1/1992 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
The approach of mutual-testing-based system diagnosis is considered for its cost effectiveness in diagnosing n-cubes ( n-dimensional hypercube multi-computer systems). Processors test each other and the test results are collected and analyzed to determine faulty processors. Four basic diagnosis strategies based on this approach are considered for n-cubes: one-t, one- t´/t´, seq-t, and seq-t´/t´. One-t and one-t´/t ´ are one-step strategies which involve only one test phase and one repair phase. The goal is to identify and replace all faulty-processors through one mutual test phase. The other two are sequential strategies which involve multiple iterative test and repair phases
Keywords :
computer testing; hypercube networks; parallel architectures; faulty-processors; hypercubes; mutual-testing-based system diagnosis; n-cubes; n-dimensional hypercube multi-computer systems; one-step strategies; repair phase; sequential strategies; test phase; Application software; Concurrent computing; Costs; Fault diagnosis; Graph theory; Hypercubes; Sequential analysis; Sequential diagnosis; System testing; Upper bound;
Journal_Title :
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on