DocumentCode
900840
Title
The rhetoric of scientific inquiry
Author
Rude, Carolyn D.
Author_Institution
Dept. of English, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX, USA
Volume
35
Issue
2
fYear
1992
fDate
6/1/1992 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
88
Lastpage
90
Abstract
Two recent books that extend the claim that scientific inquiry is rhetorical are compared and contrasted: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society by Bruno Latour, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987, and The Rhetoric of Science by Alan G. Gross, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990. Latour argues the importance of social networks in science: claims become facts when numerous resources and allies are gathered to support them. Gross applies rhetoric as defined by Aristotle to scientific texts and argues that the claims of science are solely the products of persuasion
Keywords
education; rhetoric of scientific inquiry; science; scientific texts; social networks; Anthropometry; Books; Encoding; History; Humans; Measurement standards; Rhetoric; Social network services; Speech analysis; Writing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0361-1434
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/47.144868
Filename
144868
Link To Document