Title :
The rhetoric of scientific inquiry
Author :
Rude, Carolyn D.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of English, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX, USA
fDate :
6/1/1992 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
Two recent books that extend the claim that scientific inquiry is rhetorical are compared and contrasted: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society by Bruno Latour, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987, and The Rhetoric of Science by Alan G. Gross, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990. Latour argues the importance of social networks in science: claims become facts when numerous resources and allies are gathered to support them. Gross applies rhetoric as defined by Aristotle to scientific texts and argues that the claims of science are solely the products of persuasion
Keywords :
education; rhetoric of scientific inquiry; science; scientific texts; social networks; Anthropometry; Books; Encoding; History; Humans; Measurement standards; Rhetoric; Social network services; Speech analysis; Writing;
Journal_Title :
Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on