• DocumentCode
    900840
  • Title

    The rhetoric of scientific inquiry

  • Author

    Rude, Carolyn D.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of English, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX, USA
  • Volume
    35
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    6/1/1992 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    88
  • Lastpage
    90
  • Abstract
    Two recent books that extend the claim that scientific inquiry is rhetorical are compared and contrasted: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society by Bruno Latour, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987, and The Rhetoric of Science by Alan G. Gross, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990. Latour argues the importance of social networks in science: claims become facts when numerous resources and allies are gathered to support them. Gross applies rhetoric as defined by Aristotle to scientific texts and argues that the claims of science are solely the products of persuasion
  • Keywords
    education; rhetoric of scientific inquiry; science; scientific texts; social networks; Anthropometry; Books; Encoding; History; Humans; Measurement standards; Rhetoric; Social network services; Speech analysis; Writing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0361-1434
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/47.144868
  • Filename
    144868