DocumentCode
927389
Title
Realism in assessment of effort estimation uncertainty: it matters how you ask
Author
Jorgensen, Magne
Author_Institution
Simula Res. Lab., Oslo Univ., Norway
Volume
30
Issue
4
fYear
2004
fDate
4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
209
Lastpage
217
Abstract
Traditionally, software professionals are requested to provide minimum-maximum intervals to indicate the uncertainty of their effort estimates. We claim that the traditional request is not optimal and leads to overoptimistic views about the level of estimation uncertainty. Instead, we propose that it is better to frame the request for uncertainty assessment: "How likely is it that the actual effort will be more than/less than X?" Our claim is based on the results of a previously reported-experiment and field studies in two companies. The two software companies were instructed to apply the traditional and our alternative framing on random samples of their projects. In total, we collected information about 47 projects applying the traditional-framing and 23 projects applying the alternative framing.
Keywords
professional aspects; project management; risk management; software cost estimation; software houses; alternative framing project; risk assessment; software companies; software cost estimation; software professionals; software psychology; traditional-framing project; Amplitude shift keying; Contingency management; Costs; Humans; Project management; Psychology; Risk management; Uncertainty;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0098-5589
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TSE.2004.1274041
Filename
1274041
Link To Document