• DocumentCode
    927389
  • Title

    Realism in assessment of effort estimation uncertainty: it matters how you ask

  • Author

    Jorgensen, Magne

  • Author_Institution
    Simula Res. Lab., Oslo Univ., Norway
  • Volume
    30
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    209
  • Lastpage
    217
  • Abstract
    Traditionally, software professionals are requested to provide minimum-maximum intervals to indicate the uncertainty of their effort estimates. We claim that the traditional request is not optimal and leads to overoptimistic views about the level of estimation uncertainty. Instead, we propose that it is better to frame the request for uncertainty assessment: "How likely is it that the actual effort will be more than/less than X?" Our claim is based on the results of a previously reported-experiment and field studies in two companies. The two software companies were instructed to apply the traditional and our alternative framing on random samples of their projects. In total, we collected information about 47 projects applying the traditional-framing and 23 projects applying the alternative framing.
  • Keywords
    professional aspects; project management; risk management; software cost estimation; software houses; alternative framing project; risk assessment; software companies; software cost estimation; software professionals; software psychology; traditional-framing project; Amplitude shift keying; Contingency management; Costs; Humans; Project management; Psychology; Risk management; Uncertainty;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0098-5589
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TSE.2004.1274041
  • Filename
    1274041