DocumentCode
930037
Title
Replication decoding
Author
Battail, Gbrard ; Decouvelaere, Martine C. ; Godlewski, Philippe
Volume
25
Issue
3
fYear
1979
fDate
5/1/1979 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
332
Lastpage
345
Abstract
Any symbol in a redundant code can be recovered when it belongs to certain erasure patterns. Several alternative expressions of a given symbol, to be referred to as its replicas, can therefore be computed in terms of other ones. Decoding is interpreted as decoding upon a received symbol, given itself and a number of such replicas, expressed in terms of other received symbols. For linear
block codes, soft-decision demodulation and memoryless channels, the maximum-likelihood decision rule on a given symbol is formulated in terms of
linearly independent replicas from the parity-check equations. All replicas deriving from the
selected replicas by linear combination are actually taken into account in this decision rule. Its implementation can be direct; use transformations or a sequential circuit implementing a trellis representation of the parity-check matrix. If
, decoding is optimum, in the sense of symbol-by-symbol maximum-likelihoed. Simplification results in the transformed and sequential implementations when
. If the selected replicas are disjoint, generalized (
-ary, weighted) threshold decoding results. The decoding process can easily be modffied in order to provide word-by-word maximum-likelihood decoding. Convolutional codes are briefly considered. Two specific problems are discussed: the use of previous decisions, which leads to a weighted generalization of feedback decoding, and the extension of replication decoding to nonsystematic codes.
block codes, soft-decision demodulation and memoryless channels, the maximum-likelihood decision rule on a given symbol is formulated in terms of
linearly independent replicas from the parity-check equations. All replicas deriving from the
selected replicas by linear combination are actually taken into account in this decision rule. Its implementation can be direct; use transformations or a sequential circuit implementing a trellis representation of the parity-check matrix. If
, decoding is optimum, in the sense of symbol-by-symbol maximum-likelihoed. Simplification results in the transformed and sequential implementations when
. If the selected replicas are disjoint, generalized (
-ary, weighted) threshold decoding results. The decoding process can easily be modffied in order to provide word-by-word maximum-likelihood decoding. Convolutional codes are briefly considered. Two specific problems are discussed: the use of previous decisions, which leads to a weighted generalization of feedback decoding, and the extension of replication decoding to nonsystematic codes.Keywords
Block codes; Convolutional codes; Decoding; maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding; Block codes; Convolutional codes; Demodulation; Equations; Feedback; Galois fields; Maximum likelihood decoding; Memoryless systems; Parity check codes; Sequential circuits;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9448
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TIT.1979.1056035
Filename
1056035
Link To Document