DocumentCode :
931368
Title :
An empirical study comparing pilots´ interrater reliability ratings for workload and effectiveness
Author :
Adelman, L. ; Donnell, M.L.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Inf. Syst. & Syst. Eng., George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA
Volume :
18
Issue :
6
fYear :
1988
Firstpage :
978
Lastpage :
981
Abstract :
Pilot workload and technical effectiveness have been considered to be essential criteria when evaluating aircraft operability with subjective rating techniques. However, validation studies of the mission operability assessment technique found considerably higher levels of interrater reliability for pilots´ ratings of workload than for technical effectiveness. The finding was replicated across aircraft, pilots, tasks, and with different forms of the rating scales. These results suggest that the implicit assumption that interrater reliability will be high and essentially identical for both pilot workload and technical effectiveness ratings may be invalid. This finding has implications for how one defines and subsequently measures aircraft operability with subjective rating techniques
Keywords :
aircraft; human factors; man-machine systems; operations research; aircraft; aircraft operability; human factors; interrater reliability ratings; man machine systems; mission operability assessment; pilot; Communication system control; Human factors; Interference; Military aircraft; Performance evaluation; Psychology; Testing;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9472
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/21.23095
Filename :
23095
Link To Document :
بازگشت