DocumentCode
948895
Title
Electromagnetism and semantics
Author
Field, J.C.G.
Author_Institution
, Bath, UK
Volume
135
Issue
8
fYear
1988
fDate
11/1/1988 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
523
Lastpage
527
Abstract
The terminology still in common use by many writers on electromagnetic topics is unconsciously related to the original Maxwell ether model, which gives the E, D, B and H vectors equal status as a set of four fundamental field quantities. Maxwell´s equations are usually presented in terms of all four quantities, together with the `constitutive relationships of the medium¿¿: This is an unnecessarily complicated and physically unrealistic approach, which is a source of much confusion both in students and in practising engineers. Observation demonstrates that only three axioms underlie classical electromagnetism: the invariance of electric charge, Coulomb´s law, and the constancy of the velocity of light. These axioms lead to Maxwell´s equations via special relativity and the Lorentz transformation; i.e. without any necessity for an ether concept. Further consideration of the physical implications leads to a strong recommendation that the continued use of semantically misleading terminology, such as `magnetic field strength H¿¿ or `the permittivity of free space¿¿, should be discouraged. A tentative glossary of acceptable terminology is put forward for consideration by teachers and by authors.
Keywords
education; electromagnetism; magnetic fields; Coulomb´s law; Lorentz transformation; Maxwell ether model; classical electromagnetism; education; invariance of electric charge; magnetic field strength; semantics; special relativity; velocity of light;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education - Reviews, IEE Proceedings A
Publisher
iet
ISSN
0143-702X
Type
jour
DOI
10.1049/ip-a-1.1988.0081
Filename
4648609
Link To Document