DocumentCode :
948895
Title :
Electromagnetism and semantics
Author :
Field, J.C.G.
Author_Institution :
, Bath, UK
Volume :
135
Issue :
8
fYear :
1988
fDate :
11/1/1988 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
523
Lastpage :
527
Abstract :
The terminology still in common use by many writers on electromagnetic topics is unconsciously related to the original Maxwell ether model, which gives the E, D, B and H vectors equal status as a set of four fundamental field quantities. Maxwell´s equations are usually presented in terms of all four quantities, together with the `constitutive relationships of the medium¿¿: This is an unnecessarily complicated and physically unrealistic approach, which is a source of much confusion both in students and in practising engineers. Observation demonstrates that only three axioms underlie classical electromagnetism: the invariance of electric charge, Coulomb´s law, and the constancy of the velocity of light. These axioms lead to Maxwell´s equations via special relativity and the Lorentz transformation; i.e. without any necessity for an ether concept. Further consideration of the physical implications leads to a strong recommendation that the continued use of semantically misleading terminology, such as `magnetic field strength H¿¿ or `the permittivity of free space¿¿, should be discouraged. A tentative glossary of acceptable terminology is put forward for consideration by teachers and by authors.
Keywords :
education; electromagnetism; magnetic fields; Coulomb´s law; Lorentz transformation; Maxwell ether model; classical electromagnetism; education; invariance of electric charge; magnetic field strength; semantics; special relativity; velocity of light;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education - Reviews, IEE Proceedings A
Publisher :
iet
ISSN :
0143-702X
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1049/ip-a-1.1988.0081
Filename :
4648609
Link To Document :
بازگشت