• DocumentCode
    948895
  • Title

    Electromagnetism and semantics

  • Author

    Field, J.C.G.

  • Author_Institution
    , Bath, UK
  • Volume
    135
  • Issue
    8
  • fYear
    1988
  • fDate
    11/1/1988 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    523
  • Lastpage
    527
  • Abstract
    The terminology still in common use by many writers on electromagnetic topics is unconsciously related to the original Maxwell ether model, which gives the E, D, B and H vectors equal status as a set of four fundamental field quantities. Maxwell´s equations are usually presented in terms of all four quantities, together with the `constitutive relationships of the medium¿¿: This is an unnecessarily complicated and physically unrealistic approach, which is a source of much confusion both in students and in practising engineers. Observation demonstrates that only three axioms underlie classical electromagnetism: the invariance of electric charge, Coulomb´s law, and the constancy of the velocity of light. These axioms lead to Maxwell´s equations via special relativity and the Lorentz transformation; i.e. without any necessity for an ether concept. Further consideration of the physical implications leads to a strong recommendation that the continued use of semantically misleading terminology, such as `magnetic field strength H¿¿ or `the permittivity of free space¿¿, should be discouraged. A tentative glossary of acceptable terminology is put forward for consideration by teachers and by authors.
  • Keywords
    education; electromagnetism; magnetic fields; Coulomb´s law; Lorentz transformation; Maxwell ether model; classical electromagnetism; education; invariance of electric charge; magnetic field strength; semantics; special relativity; velocity of light;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education - Reviews, IEE Proceedings A
  • Publisher
    iet
  • ISSN
    0143-702X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1049/ip-a-1.1988.0081
  • Filename
    4648609