DocumentCode
965352
Title
Gap-tolerant half-disk bubble device margins
Author
Almasi, George S.
Author_Institution
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y.
Volume
14
Issue
2
fYear
1978
fDate
3/1/1978 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
40
Lastpage
45
Abstract
A simple model is presented which allows accurate prediction of bias margins of gap-tolerant half-disk propagation tracks for bubble domains. After this is verified by comparison with experimental margin data, an "isomargin" plot is derived to show how the margin varies as a function of
and
, where
is the minimum linewidth and
is the inter-bar gap. The bias margin is shown to decrease along a fairly straight line which goes to zero when
equals the runout diameter, i.e., when
, where Ws is the bubble stripwidth or average bubble diameter. This agrees with experiment, and means that the minimum resolvable feature for half-disk type patterns must be less than
, and probably will not be much larger than
to
. It is concluded that, if made with perfect Permalloy, T-bars and half-disks should propagate isolated bubbles equally well. The advantages of half-disks over T-bars are 1) the fatal bar-crossing problem of T-bars with multiple bubbles is avoided, 2) the minimum propagation field is lower than for T-bars, and 3) half-disks seem more tolerant of "bad" (e.g., high-coercivity) Permalloy. Also tabulated are the effects on margins of variations in the device parameters of a representative design, as might be encountered in a fabrication process with finite tolerances. A brief discussion of stop-start margins is given in conclusion.
and
, where
is the minimum linewidth and
is the inter-bar gap. The bias margin is shown to decrease along a fairly straight line which goes to zero when
equals the runout diameter, i.e., when
, where W
, and probably will not be much larger than
to
. It is concluded that, if made with perfect Permalloy, T-bars and half-disks should propagate isolated bubbles equally well. The advantages of half-disks over T-bars are 1) the fatal bar-crossing problem of T-bars with multiple bubbles is avoided, 2) the minimum propagation field is lower than for T-bars, and 3) half-disks seem more tolerant of "bad" (e.g., high-coercivity) Permalloy. Also tabulated are the effects on margins of variations in the device parameters of a representative design, as might be encountered in a fabrication process with finite tolerances. A brief discussion of stop-start margins is given in conclusion.Keywords
Magnetic bubble devices; Analytical models; Fabrication; Geometry; Helium; Magnetic circuits; Magnetic domains; Shape; Solid modeling; Thumb; Virtual manufacturing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9464
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMAG.1978.1059735
Filename
1059735
Link To Document