DocumentCode
967792
Title
Comparison of natural and artificial control of movement
Author
Prochazka, Arthur
Author_Institution
Div. of Neuroscience, Alberta Univ., Edmonton, Alta., Canada
Volume
1
Issue
1
fYear
1993
fDate
3/1/1993 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
7
Lastpage
17
Abstract
Control strategies in artificial and biological systems are compared and contrasted. Distinctions are made between open-loop control, finite-state control, and proportional feedback control, all of which are found in both artificial and neural systems. The question of whether, given the remarkable similarity in the structure of the sensorimotor rules governing the control of gait, neurophysiology should always be expected, to supply the best models for the design of artificial systems is addressed. It is concluded that technical constraints, particularly in the area of sensors, more often than not dictate the approach to the problem, so that what works in the neuromuscular system may not be practical in functional electrical stimulation or prosthetics
Keywords
artificial limbs; biocontrol; biomechanics; orthotics; reviews; artificial movement control; finite-state control; gait; natural movement control; neuromuscular system; neurophysiology; open-loop control; proportional feedback control; prosthetics; sensorimotor rules; sensors; technical constraints; Biological control systems; Biological systems; Control systems; Feedback control; Neuromuscular stimulation; Neurophysiology; Open loop systems; Proportional control; Prosthetics; Sensor systems;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1063-6528
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/86.242403
Filename
242403
Link To Document