• DocumentCode
    967792
  • Title

    Comparison of natural and artificial control of movement

  • Author

    Prochazka, Arthur

  • Author_Institution
    Div. of Neuroscience, Alberta Univ., Edmonton, Alta., Canada
  • Volume
    1
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1993
  • fDate
    3/1/1993 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    7
  • Lastpage
    17
  • Abstract
    Control strategies in artificial and biological systems are compared and contrasted. Distinctions are made between open-loop control, finite-state control, and proportional feedback control, all of which are found in both artificial and neural systems. The question of whether, given the remarkable similarity in the structure of the sensorimotor rules governing the control of gait, neurophysiology should always be expected, to supply the best models for the design of artificial systems is addressed. It is concluded that technical constraints, particularly in the area of sensors, more often than not dictate the approach to the problem, so that what works in the neuromuscular system may not be practical in functional electrical stimulation or prosthetics
  • Keywords
    artificial limbs; biocontrol; biomechanics; orthotics; reviews; artificial movement control; finite-state control; gait; natural movement control; neuromuscular system; neurophysiology; open-loop control; proportional feedback control; prosthetics; sensorimotor rules; sensors; technical constraints; Biological control systems; Biological systems; Control systems; Feedback control; Neuromuscular stimulation; Neurophysiology; Open loop systems; Proportional control; Prosthetics; Sensor systems;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1063-6528
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/86.242403
  • Filename
    242403