• DocumentCode
    975252
  • Title

    Relationship of Psychological and Physiological Variables in Long-Term Self-Monitored Data During Work Ability Rehabilitation Program

  • Author

    Parkka, Juha ; Merilahti, Juho ; Mattila, Elina M. ; Malm, Esko ; Antila, Kari ; Tuomisto, Martti T. ; Saarinen, Ari Viljam ; Van Gils, Mark ; Korhonen, Ilkka

  • Author_Institution
    Tech. Res. Centre, Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, Tampere
  • Volume
    13
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    3/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    141
  • Lastpage
    151
  • Abstract
    Individual wellness comprises both psychological and physiological wellbeing, which are interrelated. In long-term monitoring of wellness, both components should be included. Work-related stress and burnout are persistent problems in industrial countries. Early identification of work-related stress symptoms and early intervention could reduce individual suffering and improve the working productivity and creativity. The goal of this study was to explore the relationship between physiological and psychological variables measured at home by the users themselves or automatically. In all, 17 (3 males and 14 females, age 40-62) people participating in a work ability rehabilitation program (due to work overload) were monitored for three months. Physiological and behavioral variables (activity, bed occupancy, heart rate (HR) and respiration during night, HR during day, blood pressure, steps, weight, room illumination, and temperature) were measured with different unobtrusive wireless sensors. Daily self-assessment of stress, mood, and behaviors (exercise, sleep) were collected using a mobile phone diary. The daily self-assessment of stress and the Derogatis stress profile questionnaire were used as reference for stress status. Results show modest, but significant pooled overall correlations between self-assessed stress level, and physiological and behavioral variables (e.g., sleep length measured with wrist-worn activity monitor: rho = -0.22, p<0.001, and variance of nightly bedroom illumination: rho = 0.13, p<0.001). Strong, but sometimes conflicting correlations can be found at individual level, suggesting individual reactions to stress in daily life.
  • Keywords
    biomedical telemetry; occupational health; occupational medicine; patient monitoring; patient rehabilitation; psychology; Derogatis stress profile questionnaire; age 40 yr to 62 yr; long-term self-monitoring; mobile phone diary; physiological variable; psychological variable; self-assessment; time 3 month; unobtrusive wireless sensors; wellness monitoring; work ability rehabilitation program; work-related stress; working productivity; Actigraph; behavior; heart rate (HR); psychological and physiological variables; sleep; stress; wellness monitoring; Adult; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Blood Pressure Monitors; Burnout, Professional; Data Collection; Female; Health; Health Promotion; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Questionnaires; Regression Analysis; Self Assessment (Psychology); Sleep; Statistics, Nonparametric; Stress, Physiological; Stress, Psychological; User-Computer Interface; Workplace;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1089-7771
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TITB.2008.2007078
  • Filename
    4664421