• DocumentCode
    981756
  • Title

    Comparison of Reliability and Testing Models

  • Author

    Schneidewind, Norman

  • Author_Institution
    Naval Postgrad. Sch., Monterey, CA
  • Volume
    57
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2008
  • Firstpage
    607
  • Lastpage
    615
  • Abstract
    We were curious about how well various reliability and testing models would compare with respect to prediction accuracy and testing effectiveness. Therefore, we conducted several experiments to evaluate these properties for the following models: fault tree analysis, geometric and binomial statistical models; and reliability growth models: Yamada S Shape Model, Schneidewind Single Parameter Model, and Schneidewind Software Reliability Model. We developed modified versions of the geometric and binomial models that comprise a new contribution to the body of software reliability research. The Yamada model provided the best prediction accuracy for one of the Shuttle´s failure data sets. Future research would involve evaluating all models against multiple data sets.
  • Keywords
    binomial distribution; fault trees; program testing; software reliability; Schneidewind single parameter model; Schneidewind software reliability model; Yamada S shape model; binomial statistical models; fault tree analysis; geometric models;; reliability growth models; testing models; Model comparison; software reliability; software testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9529
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TR.2008.2005859
  • Filename
    4668473