DocumentCode
981756
Title
Comparison of Reliability and Testing Models
Author
Schneidewind, Norman
Author_Institution
Naval Postgrad. Sch., Monterey, CA
Volume
57
Issue
4
fYear
2008
Firstpage
607
Lastpage
615
Abstract
We were curious about how well various reliability and testing models would compare with respect to prediction accuracy and testing effectiveness. Therefore, we conducted several experiments to evaluate these properties for the following models: fault tree analysis, geometric and binomial statistical models; and reliability growth models: Yamada S Shape Model, Schneidewind Single Parameter Model, and Schneidewind Software Reliability Model. We developed modified versions of the geometric and binomial models that comprise a new contribution to the body of software reliability research. The Yamada model provided the best prediction accuracy for one of the Shuttle´s failure data sets. Future research would involve evaluating all models against multiple data sets.
Keywords
binomial distribution; fault trees; program testing; software reliability; Schneidewind single parameter model; Schneidewind software reliability model; Yamada S shape model; binomial statistical models; fault tree analysis; geometric models;; reliability growth models; testing models; Model comparison; software reliability; software testing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9529
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TR.2008.2005859
Filename
4668473
Link To Document