DocumentCode :
983231
Title :
COD: alternative architectures for high speed packet switching
Author :
Cruz, R.L. ; Tsai, Jung-Tsung
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., California Univ., San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
fYear :
1996
fDate :
2/1/1996 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
11
Lastpage :
21
Abstract :
Architectures for packet switches are approaching the limit of electronic switching speed. This raises the question of how best to utilize advances in photonic technology to enable higher speeds. The authors introduce cascaded optical delay line (COD) architectures. The COD architectures utilize an extremely simple distributed electronic control algorithm to configure the states of 2×2 photonic switches and use optical fiber delay lines to temporarily buffer packets if necessary. The simplicity of the architectures may also make them suitable for “lightweight” all-electronic implementations. For optical implementations, the number of 2×2 photonic switches used is a significant factor determining cost. The authors present a “baseline” architecture for a 2×2 buffered packet switch that is work conserving and has the first-in, first-out (FIFO) property. If the arrival processes are independent and without memory, the maximum utilization factor is ρ, and the maximum acceptable packet loss probability is ε, then the required number of 2×2 photonic switches is O(log(ε)/log(γ)), where γ=ρ2/(ρ2+4-4ρ). If one modifies the baseline architecture by changing the delay line lengths then the system is no longer work conserving and loses the FIFO property, but the required number of 2×2 photonic switches is reduced to O(log[log(ε)/log(γ)]). The required number of 2×2 photonic switches is essentially insensitive to the distribution of packet arrivals, but long delay lines are required for bursty traffic
Keywords :
buffer storage; optical delay lines; optical fibre communication; packet switching; photonic switching systems; 2×2 buffered packet switch; 2×2 photonic switches; COD; FIFO; arrival processes; baseline architecture; bursty traffic; cascaded optical delay line architectures; delay line lengths; distributed electronic control algorithm; first-in first-out; high speed packet switching; lightweight all-electronic implementations; maximum acceptable packet loss probability; maximum utilization factor; optical fiber delay lines; photonic technology; Delay lines; Distributed control; High speed optical techniques; Optical buffering; Optical control; Optical packet switching; Optical switches; Packet switching; Photonics; Ultraviolet sources;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1063-6692
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/90.503758
Filename :
503758
Link To Document :
بازگشت