• DocumentCode
    985704
  • Title

    A comparison of boundary integral formulations for 2D axisymmetric eddy current problems

  • Author

    Ramadan, A.M. ; Lavers, J.D. ; Burke, P.E.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng., Toronto Univ., Ont., Canada
  • Volume
    24
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1988
  • fDate
    1/1/1988 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    138
  • Lastpage
    141
  • Abstract
    Boundary element formulations based on a direct manipulation of the boundary integral equations, the Mueller method, and the applications of the impedance boundary condition (IBC) are compared. The basis of the comparison is primarily the numerical performance for solving the classic problem of a conducting sphere in a time harmonic field. It is shown that the Mueller formulation, despite having lower order singularities, can be significantly in error in comparison with the direct and IBC formulations. A short conducting cylinder coaxial with a short current sheet is used to test the direct and Mueller formulations at low penetration-depth values, and good results are obtained
  • Keywords
    boundary-elements methods; eddy currents; 2D axisymmetric eddy current problems; Mueller method; boundary integral equations; boundary integral formulations; conducting cylinder coaxial; conducting sphere; impedance boundary condition; low penetration-depth values; lower order singularities; numerical performance; short current sheet; time harmonic field; Boundary conditions; Coaxial components; Conductors; Eddy currents; Electromagnetic fields; Engine cylinders; Finite difference methods; Impedance; Integral equations; Magnetic separation; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/20.43875
  • Filename
    43875