• DocumentCode
    991375
  • Title

    Comments on "Hamiltonian adaptive control of spacecraft" by J.J.E. Slotine and M.D. Di Benedetto

  • Author

    Fossen, Thor I.

  • Author_Institution
    Div. of Eng. Cybern., Norwegian Inst. of Technol., Trondheim, Norway
  • Volume
    38
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    1993
  • fDate
    4/1/1993 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    671
  • Lastpage
    672
  • Abstract
    In the adaptive scheme presented in the original paper (ibid., vol.35, no.7, p.848-52, 1990) for attitude tracking control of rigid spacecraft, the spacecraft is parametrized in terms of the inertial frame. The commenter shows how a parameterization in body coordinates considerably simplifies the representation of the adaptation scheme. The new symbolic expression for the regressor matrix is easy to find even for six-degree-of-freedom (DOF) Hamiltonian systems with a large number of unknown parameters. If the symbolic expression for the regressor matrix is known in advance, the computational complexity is approximately equal for both representations. An example illustrates the advantage of the new representation when modeling a simple three-DOF model of the lateral motion of a space shuttle.<>
  • Keywords
    adaptive control; attitude control; computational complexity; space vehicles; Hamiltonian adaptive control; attitude tracking control; body coordinates parameterization; computational complexity; inertial frame parameterization; lateral motion; regressor matrix; rigid spacecraft; space shuttle; symbolic expression; Adaptive control; Attitude control; Computational complexity; Control systems; Gravity; Programmable control; Space shuttles; Space vehicles; Torque control; Vectors;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9286
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/9.250547
  • Filename
    250547