نقش نقد قوة حكم در تبيين علّيت تجربي در ايدئاليسم استعلايي كانت

The role of "Critique of Judgment" in the explanation of experiential causality in transcendental idealism of Kant

نقش نقد قوة حكم در تبيين علّيت تجربي در ايدئاليسم استعلايي كانت را از دو منظر مي‌توان مورد توجه قرار داد. يكي، از نظرِ تكميل تبيين معناي علّيت تجربي در آنالوژي دوم و آنتينومي سوم از نقد عقل محض و ديگري، تبيين ارتباط ميان قانون پيشيني علّيت تجربي با قوانين پسيني علّيت تجربي. كانت در نقد قوة حكم با تأكيد بر تمايز ميان قانون پيشيني، قوام‌بخش و مطلقاً ضروري علّيت با قوانين پسيني، غيرضروري و تجربي علّيت، تلاش مي‌كند شكاف ميان اين دو دسته قانون را با اصل پيشيني و نظام‌بخش غايتمندي پُر كند كه اصول مكانيسم و اُرگانيسم (غايت‌شناسي) از كاربردهاي آن هستند و مي‌كوشد بدين وسيله تبيين ايدئاليسم استعلايي خود از علّيت تجربي را تكميل كند كه عبارت است از اينكه ما قانون عام علّيت را مستقل از قوانين تجربي خاصي داريم كه قرار است در تجربه كشف شوند و اينكه علّيت هميشه به ادراك حسي برمي‌گردد.

the role of the "Critique of Judgment" in the explanation of empirical causality in the transcendental idealism of Kant, could be considered from two aspect. first is the explanation of meaning of experiential causality in the "Critique of Pure Reason", and another is the explanation of relation between a priori law of experiential causality and a-posteriori laws of experiential causality. Kant in the "Critique of Judgment", with assertion on distinction between a priori, constitutive, and absolutely necessary principle of causation and a-posteriori, unnecessary, and experiential causality laws, tries to fill the gap between the two classes of laws by a priori and regulative principle and of purposiveness that mechainism and organism(teleology) are it's applications and so completes his explanation about his transcendental idealism about experiential causality.Kant in the "Critique of Judgment", with assertion on distinction between a priori, constitutive, and absolutely necessary principle of causation and a-posteriori, unnecessary, and experiential causality laws, tries to fill the gap between the two classes of laws by a priori and regulative principle and of purposiveness that mechainism and organism(teleology) are it's applications and so completes his explanation about his transcendental idealism about experiential causality.