بررسي تغييرات طول عضله يا زاويه مفصلي بر ميزان هم كنشي عضله مخالف در انقباض ايزومتريك

هدف: پژوهش حاضر در صدد است تا به اين سوال پاسخ دهد كه آيا تغييرات طول عضله يا زاويه مفصلي بر ميزان هم كنشي عضله مخالف در انقباض ايزومتريك تاثير گذار است؟ روش‌شناسي: آزمودني‌هاي اين تحقيق 15 نفر از دانشجويان پسر تربيت‌بدني دانشگاه شهيد بهشتي با ميانگين سن 58/1 67/21 سال، قد 13/5 93/172 سانتيمتر و وزن 41/5 85/60 كيلوگرم بودند. نمونه‌هاي انتخاب شده همگي سالم بوده و هيچگونه سابقة ناراحتي، درد و عمل جراحي در مفاصل بازو، آرنج ، مچ دست و نيز هيچگونه سابقة‌ آسيب ديدگي در عضلة مربوط را نداشتند. اين اطلاعات از طريق پرسشنامه و قبل از اجراي پژوهش تعيين شد. اطلاعات انتگرال الكتروميوگرافي (IEMG) عضلات دوسر و سه‌سر بازويي دست برتر هر آزمودني با اعمال حداكثر انقباض ارادي در زواياي 90-120 و حالت اكستنشن كامل (صفر درجه) از مفصل آرنج از طريق دستگاه الكتروميوگرافي اندازه‌گيري و مورد بررسي قرارگرفت. براي تعيين تفاوت آماري در متغيرهاي پژوهش از آزمون t استودنت در سطح معني‌داري 05/0

This study seeks to answer this question that the variations of muscle length or joint angular can change the rate of coactivation of antagonist muscle in isometric contraction? The subjects were 15 male students with average age 21.67±1.58 yr, height 172.93±5.13 cm and weight 60.85±5.41kg. All subjects were healthy and had no any history of pain or injury in arm, elbow and wrist. IEMG were taken from biceps and triceps with maximal voluntary contraction in 90-120 and 180 degree of elbow joint. Results showed that maximal voluntary contraction of elbow in 90º and 120º angle (P=0.001) were significantly increased in comparison with 180º. Whereas there were no significant difference between maximal voluntary contraction of elbow in 90º and 120º angle (P=0.516).The electrical activity of biceps and triceps in elbow angles of 90º (P=0.010) and 120º (P=0.002) were significantly greater than 180º (P=0.043). Also there were no significant difference between electrical activity of biceps and triceps in elbow angles of 90º (P=0.819) and 120º (P=0.202). Results indicate that other factors except joint angel would affect the research outcomes. Some researchers report differences in muscles recruitment patterns due to velocity of movement, amount and type of muscle work and force production. Joint angel has the most effect than other factors such as movement velocity. So Joint angel as a prominent factor in control of recruitment patterns of muscles should be noticed. It is important that when bodybuildings coach’s sports teams want strengthen a particular muscle with respect to its importance in moving a given motion in a particular sport, that in this case to put the muscle at greatest burden, surrounding muscle and joint angles should be considered very carefully regulated.