پديد آورندگان :
مللي،مهديه دانشگاه اصفهان , نصر اصفهاني، محمدرضا دانشگاه اصفهان- زبان و ادبيات فارسي , نجفي،زهره دانشگاه اصفهان- زبان و ادبيات فارسي
كليدواژه :
الگوي كنشگر گريماس , داستان زال و رودابه , شاهنامه , ساختار روايي
چكيده فارسي :
ساختارگرايي ادبي پس از تفسير محورهاي بنيادين هر اثر ادبي، به دنبال ايجاد يك نظرية ادبي عام است و موقعيت درستي از نشانه‌ها، عناصر، محورهاي هنري، زباني و روايت‌شناسي آثار ارائه مي‌دهد. ساختارگرايي در داستان بيشتر به عنصر روايت مي‌پردازد. در اين نوشتار داستان «زال و رودابه» براساس الگوي كنشگر گريماس، روايت‌شناس فرانسوي، بررسي شده است. او با ارائة الگوي كنشي و پيوند آن با شخصيت و موقعيت، بررسي روايت را آسان كرد و الگوي كارآمدي در تعيين ميزان كنش‌مندي و كنش‌پذيري عامل داستاني ارائه داد. هدف اين الگو نمايان كردن نقش شخصيت‌ها در پيشبرد جريان داستان و حوادث آن است. در اين پژوهش باتكيه‌بر روش كتابخانه‌اي ـ تحليلي، ساختار داستان بر مبناي تقابل‌هاي دوگانه، زنجيره‌هاي روايي و مربع معناشناسي گريماس بررسي شده است. پس از بررسي، اين نتيجه به دست آمد كه استواري داستان، ساختار آن و پيوستگي اجزاي آن منطبق با اين الگوست و شش كنشگر گريماس (فاعل، مفعول، فرستنده، ياريگر، بازدارنده، گيرنده) در داستان حضور داشتند.
چكيده لاتين :
Russian formalists were the first to make extensive studies in the field of storytelling and constructivist rhetoric. One of the most prominent was Vladimir Popp and his famous work "The Morphology of Fairy Tales".In this book, he identified the basic script in the popular Russian stories. Each of these motifs points to character behavior. He believed that the narrative first began with a steady state of affairs, and then came under the influence of actions and forces. Structuralism entered France in the 1950s and 1960s, and the votes of those like Todorov, Grimes, Barrett, Burmon, and so on, had long dominated the circles of thought in the world. French narrative Grimas, by presenting a pattern of engagement and linking it to personality and position, facilitated narrative review. He based on narrative on the basis of the morphology of the story of Vladimir Prop and believed that in each story, there were six actors. His six actors are:1. Transmitter; 2. Receiver; 3. Subject; 4. Object of value; 5. Inhibitor; 6. Contributor (Abbasi, 1393: 68-69). Structure analysis, based on the narrative structureist theory, helps to discover the type of relationship between actors and the meaning of the narrative; in other words, the meaningfulness of the text is proven due to its narrative structure analysis.The main purpose of this paper is to find out the validity of the narrative of Zal and Roudabeh from the perspective of O.G.Grams and to better understand the degree of adaptability of the story to the multiplicity of the theory of action, action, passivity and positioning, language and narration, as well as the importance of the actions of each actor in Advancing the process of the story. It also seeks to show that incidents are the birthstone of actions that are the main cause of these actions as contradictory by the characters themselves. The main contradiction in this story is the racial contradiction (Iranian and Zahakians) that shadows the entire structure of the story and is the main factor in expanding action. Zal acts under the influence of love and tries to overcome all contradictions in the story, and in fact his actions are the circuit of the story. The story has been analyzed in accordance with these six activists and used to represent the dual oppositions (racial contradiction) of the square of the semantics of Gremos as a logical model for denoting the contradiction. The narrative chains and syntactic rules in this story are in accordance with the model and the views of Grimes in this story. The most important research questions: one, what is the meaning of the interaction pattern of Gremos in analyzing the story of Zal and Roudabeh of the status, incident, personality, and square language? and according to the pattern of Germas, is the story of Zal and Roudabeh a coherent and systematic structure?
