نقش داور بعد از صدور رأي

The Role of the Arbitrator after the Issuance of Award

صدور رأي توسط داور به معناي پايان مسئوليت او نيست. رأي داوري ممكن است اشكالات اجرايي متعددي داشته و نيازمند تكميل يا تصحيح باشد. بنابراين نقش داور بعد از صدور رأي نيز حائز اهميت است و مباحثي مانند قلمرو و حدود دخالت داور را مطرح مي‌كند. آيا داور حق دارد در موضوعاتي كه به هر دليل از قلم افتاده است، رأي تازه صادر كند؟ با اشتباهات داوري مانند انواع اشتباه نگارشي چه بايد كرد؟ داور ممكن است اظهاراتي مغاير با رأي خود بيان و ادعاي اشتباه اساسي در رأي كند. ممكن است دعاوي جزايي يا مدني عليه داور اقامه و رأي محكوميت صادر شود كه مغاير با رأي داوري سابق باشد. همچنين آيا داور حق دارد از صحت رأي خود دفاع و در دعاوي مربوط به هر دليل دخالت كند؟ اين مسائل كه ممكن است در عمل ديده شوند، موضوع مقاله حاضر است.

The rendering of an arbitral award by an arbitrator does not mean the termination of the mandate. The arbitral award may involve several enforcement problems and may require some completions or corrections. Therefore, the role of the arbitrator after rendering the arbitral award is excessively significant and arises some debates such as the scope and limits of arbitrator's intervention. Is the arbitrator competent to render an additional award on subject-matters that have been neglected for any reason? What should be done with the typographical errors or misprints? In the course of arbitration, the arbitrator may make some statements in contradiction with his award and may also make fundamental mistakes in the mentioned award. It is possible that some criminal or civil liability actions being brought against the arbitrator that can lead to his conviction that will be contrary to the arbitral award. Also, the question remains whether the arbitrator is entitled to defend the validity of his rendered award and to intervene in any relevant cases for any reason. These debates and some other issues that can be faced in practice are discussed in this article.