تجارب دانش آموزان پسر ابتدايي از اجراي ارزشيابي توصيفي

Experiences of elementary male students from descriptive evaluation

در اين پژوهش تجارب عميق دانش ­آموزان پسر پايه هاي چهارم و پنجم ابتدايي از اجراي طرح ارزشيابي توصيفي به شيوه ­ي كيفي و از نوع پديدارشناسي بررسي شد. با توجه به ماهيت پژوهش از روش نمونه­ گيري هدفمند استفاده شد كه با مصاحبه عميق 9 دانش ­آموز، داده ­هاي اخذ شده به اشباع رسيد. داده ­ها با استفاده از نرم ­افزار MAXQDA10 كدگذاري و تحليل شد. يافته­ هاي حاصل از تجارب اينن افراد در 5 مضمون اصلي"ادراك مثبت از ارزشيابي توصيفي"، "ادراك منفي از ارزشيابي توصيفي"، "مناسب پايه­ هاي پايين"، "متضرر شدن دانش ­آموزان ضعيف" و " مورد پسند والدين دانش­آموزان ضعيف" و چندين مضمون فرعي خلاصه شد.اين يافته ­ها مي ­توانند تصويري گويا از چگونگي برنامه توصيفي در حال اجرا، معايب و مزاياي آن در اختيار مسوولين و برنامه ­ريزان قرار دهد. تا در جهت رفع اشكالات و بهبود، حذف يا جايگزيني اين طرح اقداماتي انجام دهند.

This study was conducted with aim of investigating profound experience of elementary male students in the fourth and fifth grades from the descriptive assessment. To this purpose, the method qualitative and phenomenological methods were employed to address the research questions. The purposeful sampling was used with regard to the nature and objectives of the study. The collected data were saturated by interviewing with 9 students. The final data were analyzed by Smith's Analysis Method and MAXQDA10 software and the obtained results were summarized and categorized as 5 themes and several subthemes. These themes included: "positive perception of descriptive assessment", "negative perception of descriptive assessment", "appropriate for bottom grades" pleasant for lazy students parents "and" harmful for lazy students". The findings of this study could guide authorities to examine the conditions of descriptive assessment, as well as the advantages and disadvantages. This could encourage and facilitate the attempts toward improvement and solving the current problems for eliminating or replacing this method.