عنوان مقاله :
اين مقاله به زبان انگليسي مي باشد .
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Analysis of Creativity in Architectural Design after the Islamic Revolution; Case Study: The Selected Award Winning Architectural Works
پديد آورندگان :
soltanzadeh hossein Department of Architecture - College of Architecture and Urbanism - Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University - Tehran, Iran , bazrafkan kaveh Department of Architecture - College of Architecture and Urbanism - Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University - Tehran, Iran , ilka shahab Department of Architecture - UAE Branch - Islamic Azad University - Dubai, UAE
كليدواژه :
Indices of Creative Design , Design Process of Architecture , Creativity
چكيده فارسي :
اين مقاله بدون چكيده فارسي مي باشد.
چكيده لاتين :
This research focuses on the analysis of creativity in the process of architectural design
works of the Islamic revolution in Iran. The research methodology is “descriptive-analytic” in the stage of
theoretical literature and “content analysis” in the operational stage. The statistical population is composed
of four architectural works chosen from “Memar” award winning architectural works in 2001-2017 based
on the indices derived from theoretical foundations, i.e. “a. value exhibition, b. creation of ambiguity,
c. creation of tension, d. form transformability and deconstruction, e. use of tangible and intangible
metaphors, and f. use of paradox and metaphysics”. This study tries to evaluate the creativity indices in
the selected samples and seeks to see whether there is any significant relationship between the indices of
creativity and the effectiveness of the works and the process of their selection as the superior sample. At
the end, the analyses suggest that there is no significant relationship between the effectiveness of these
indices in the totality of works and the process of selection as creative works; it seems that the referees of
the competition did not have any unique procedure for their selection. Moreover, it is concluded that the
ambiguity in the process of design has been against the creation of value; because the effects with higher
mean marks in value exhibition, contradiction, order and chaos, fullness and emptiness, lightness and
heaviness, natural and artificial, new and old offer lower marks in “creation of ambiguity”. Paradox and
metaphysics were of the highest degrees and the factor of “new and old” had the lowest ranks. Given the
types of architectural styles of revolution, in terms of form, modern materials and technologies, unique
examples of creativity have taken form proportionate to the growth of technology and the relationship of
the context and background of the monument
عنوان نشريه :
معماري و شهرسازي آرمان شهر
