روابط علمي زيديه و اماميه از غيبت صغري تا قرن ششم هجري

Ziydiyah and Imamiyyah Intellectual Relations in Short Occultation until the Sixth Century A.H

ﻧﻘﺶ آﻓﺮيني سياسي و ﻓﻜﺮي اماميه و زﻳﺪﻳﻪ، دو فرقه اﺛﺮﮔﺬار شيعي، در برخي زﻣﺎنﻫﺎ ﺑﺎرز و اﻧﻜﺎرﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ اﺳﺖ. از اﻳﻦ رو، ﺿﺮوري اﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ واﻛﺎوي ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎت اﻳﻦ دو فرقه ممتاز شيعي، ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺮرسي ﺑﺮﻫﻪاي از تاريخ فكري اماميه، ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺎط واﮔﺮايي آنها در آﻣﻮزهﻫﺎي ﻛﻼمي و دادوستد ميراث حديثي آنان دﺳﺖ يابيم. اين ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، در پي ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ اﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ‌ها اﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ اين دو فرقه مهم شيعه، در ﻣﺤﺪوده زﻣﺎني غيبت ﺻﻐﺮي ﺗﺎ پايان قرن ششم ﻫ در ﭼﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎيي روابط علمي داشته‌اند؟ هم‌چنين فعالان اين عرصه چه كساني بوده‌اند؟ روابط اﻳﻦ دو ﻓﺮﻗﻪ در اين سده‌ها ﺑﻪ دليل ﭘﺎره‌اي از اﺷﺘﺮاﻛﺎت اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ و در عين ﺣﺎل، ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ اﺧﺘﻼف در برخي از اﺻﻮل ﻣﺬﻫبي، ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰات ﻓﺮﻗﻪاي ﺧﻮﻳﺶ را نيز دﻧﺒﺎل ميﻛﺮدﻧﺪ. ﺑﺮاي ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ‌ها و اﺛﺒﺎت اﻳﻦ ﻓﺮضيه‌ها رواﺑﻂ علمي اﻣﺎميه و زﻳﺪﻳﻪ در ايران، به‌ويژه ري، در اﻳﻦ ﺑﺎزه زﻣﺎني با استفاده از روش تاريخي و شيوه توصيفي- تحليلي با تكيه بر منابع ﺑﺮرسي مي‌گردد.

Imamiyyah and Ziydiyah's political and religious leadership, as two influential Shiite sects, is apparent. Hence, it is necessary to find out from the studies of the two leading Shiite sects, especially the Imamiyyah's intellectual history, to the points of divergence in their theology and hadith exchanges. This article seeks to show that in what ways these two important Shiite sects, had their intellectual relationship in the short occultation (ghiybah al-sughra) until the end of the sixth century. Who were working in this field? Relations between the two sects in these centuries have been driven by a series of core practices, but, because of some disagreements in religious principles, they have also been pursuing their distinction from each other. In order to answer to the questions and proving the hypotheses, the intellectual relationships between Imamiyyah and Ziydiyah in Iran, especially Rey, are examined, using historical methods and a descriptive-analytic method based on the primitive sources.