تحليل گفتماني مناظره ابو سعيد سيرافي و ابوبشر متي

Discursive Analysis of Debate of Abu Sa'id Syrafi Nahwi and Abu Bashar Mata

مناظره ابوسعيد سيرافي نحوي و ابو بشر منطقي از گره­ گا­ه­ هاي كليدي تمدن اسلامي است. اين مناظره محل برخورد دو جريان اصلي برخاسته از رفرم ايدئولوژيك عباسي بود. يك جريان نهضت ترجمه و پيامدهاي فكري آن و جريان ديگر دستگاه عقيدتي، فقهي و كلامي عصر عباسي است. جدا از اشكالات جدي سيرافي در رابطه با جاي­گاه منطق و رابطه منطق و زبان و نحو، اين مناظره هدايت­گر تنش ناشي از برخورد دو جريان فوق نيز مي­ باشد. در اين مقاله سعي كرد­ه ايمبا توصيفي تاريخي و تبارشناسي از نهضت ترجمه و عصر تدوين به تحليل گفتماني اين مناظره وارد و اين تنش ايدئولوژيك را بررسي و تشريح كنيم.به نظر مي ­رسد كه نتايج اين مناظره تأثيرات دامنه ­داري بر تفكر اسلامي نهاده باشد و در هردو جريان عقيدتي و فلسفي تغييرات پايداري داشته است. جريان فلسفي هم از منطق گرايي دور شد و به سمت بنياني رفت كه فارابي و سپس ابن سينا با عنوان فلسفه مشاء نهادند

The debate of Abu Sa'id Syrafi Nahwi and Abu Bashar Mata is one of the key nodes of Islamic civilization.This debate was the focus of the two main streams that arose from the Abbasid ideological reform. One-way Translation Movement and its implications and other way ideological and theological and jurisprudential systems, generated in Age of Editing. Apart from serious issues regarding the position of logic and the relation between logic and language and syntax, this debate drives the tension caused by the collision of the two above-mentioned flows.In this paper,with the historical and genealogical descriptions of the Translation Movement and the Age of Editing, we go to discursive analysis of the debate, and explain this ideological tension. It seems that the results of this debate have also had a wide range of implications for Islamic thought, and have had sustained changes in both the ideological and philosophical trends. After debate, the ideological stream left out the former enemy with logic and attracted logic for use.The philosophical flow was also diverted from logics and went to the foundations that Farabi and Avicenna called peripatetic school.