ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ و اﻋﺘﺒﺎرﯾﺎﺑﯽ آزﻣﻮن ﭼﺎﺑﮑﯽ ﺟﺪﯾﺪ وﯾﮋه ﺑﺴﮑﺘﺒﺎل

Designing and Validating a New Agility Test for Basketball

زﻣﯿﻨﻪ و ﻫﺪف: ﯾﮏ آزﻣﻮن ﮐﺎﻣﻞ در ورزﺷﯽ ﺧﺎص ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻧﯿﺎزﻫﺎي ﺣﺮﮐﺘﯽ و ﻓﯿﺰﯾﻮﻟﻮژﯾﮑﯽ ﺧﺎص درﮔﯿﺮ در آن ورزش ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ.ﻫﺪف از اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ اﻋﺘﺒﺎر و ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ آزﻣﻮن ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه ﺟﺪﯾﺪ ﭼﺎﺑﮑﯽ در ﺑﺴﮑﺘﺒﺎل ﺑﻮد. روش ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ: آزﻣﻮدﻧﯽﻫﺎي ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ را ﺗﻌﺪاد 65 ﻧﻔﺮ از ﺑﺎزﯾﮑﻨﺎن ﻏﯿﺮﻧﺨﺒﻪ و 105 ﻧﻔﺮ از ﺑﺎزﯾﮑﻨﺎن ﻧﺨﺒﻪ ﺑﺴﮑﺘﺒﺎل ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ﻣﯽ دادﻧﺪ. آزﻣﻮن ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﺮﮐﺎت ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮپ و ﺑﺪون ﺗﻮپ در داﻣﻨﻪ ﻃﻮﻟﯽ زﻣﯿﻦ ﺑﺴﮑﺘﺒﺎل ﺑﻮد ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎزﯾﮑﻨﺎن در دو وﺿﻌﯿﺖ ﺑﺎز و ﺑﺴﺘﻪ اﻧﺠﺎم ﻣﯽ دادﻧﺪ. آزﻣﻮن ﻣﻼك ﭼﺎﺑﮑﯽ در اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ، آزﻣﻮن Tﺑﻮد. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﺑﯿﻦ اﺟﺮاي آزﻣﻮن ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﺑﺴﺘﻪ و ﺑﺎز ﺑﺎ آزﻣﻮن T ﺑﺪون در ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻬﺎرﺗﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري وﺟﻮد دارد (0/050/80، P)، ﮐﻪ اﯾﻦ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ در ﮔﺮوه ﻧﺨﺒﻪ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ از ﮔﺮوه ﻏﯿﺮ ﻧﺨﺒﻪ ﺑﻮد (0/80>r). ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ درون ﮔﺮوﻫﯽ (ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ) دو ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ اﺟﺮاي آزﻣﻮن ﭼﺎﺑﮑﯽ ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﺑﺴﺘﻪ و ﺑﺎز ﺑﺪون در ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻬﺎرﺗﯽ ﺑﺎﻻ و ﻣﻌﻨﯽ دار ﺑﻮد (0/050/90، P). ﻋﻼوه ﺑﺮ اﯾﻦ آزﻣﻮن ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﺑﺎز و ﺑﺴﺘﻪ داراي ﺗﻮاﻧﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮي ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ آزﻣﻮن T در ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﭼﺎﺑﮑﯽ ﺑﻮد (0/05

Background &Purpose: A perfect test in a particular sport is designed based on the specific motor and physiological needs involved in that sport. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of a newly-designed agility test for basketball. Methodology:The participants of the study involved 65 female basketball players from non-elite players and 105 from elite players. The designed test included various movements with and without the ball in the longitudinal range of the basketball court performed in both open and closed models. The standardized test for evaluating agility was the T test. Results:The results showed that, regardless of skill levels, there was a significant relationship between the participants’ performance on the designed test in both open and closed models and the T test (r > 0.8, p < .05); this correlation was higher among elite players (r > 0.9). Regardless of skill levels, the intraclass correlation (reliability) between the two performances of the newly-designed agility test in both open and closed models was high and significant (r > 0.9, p < .05). In addition, the designed test in both open and closed models could better evaluate agility when compared with the T test (p < .05). Conclusion:It could be concluded that the agility test designed for basketball was a valid and reliable alternative to the T test in both open and close models and could better differentiate skill levels among female basketball players.