چكيده لاتين :
Introduction Human societies have gone through many ups and downs in their pursuit of growth and excellence, and in this field, the main aspiration of providing favorable economic, social, political, and so on .They have been members of the community .Basically, one of the most important issues for countries in different periods is to look at ways of improvement and overall development of rural areas, and therefore rural development as one of the subdivisions of development, but also the most important one. It is a multidimensional process that aims to improve, improve the quality of life of the poor and vulnerable sections of the rural community. In addition, "people's participation" is a fundamental prerequisite for action that forms part of the operational aspect of development. Development theory, with regard to purpose and content, emphasizes the importance of participation at all levels, from the crucial stage of identifying needs to the final stage of evaluating and implementing the program, as well as the intermediate stages of decision-making regarding goal setting, resource utilization and Operations management indicates.
Methodology
The type of research is applied-developmental and the method is documentary, analytical and survey study .In order to complete the existing information, first class resources such as questionnaire were used .In the analytical method ،according to the presented hypothesis ،each of the components is introduced. Accordingly, each component identifies the extent of individual participation and its role in rural development with a number of indicators, then examines the components of poverty in the political dimension and the relationship between these two variables of participation and political poverty using the correlation coefficient model .
The software for the analysis of this research is households living in rural areas of Saravan .The independent variables of the research are: participation (each of the social, political and service-physical dimensions of participation), attitude towards participation and the dependent variable is also political poverty .The statistical population of the study is the total rural households of Saravan, which according to the results of the 2011 census has 6 villages and 4283 households .
Morgan table was used to determine the sample size of household heads living in rural areas of Saravan. Finally, 351 questionnaires were selected which increased to 370 for better results.
Result and Discution
There is a meaningful relationship between 95% and 95% confidence level for interpreting the degree of correlation between political poverty and political participation. Since the Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.634 indicates a negative correlation between these two variables, the greater the political participation, the less political poverty. There is a significant relationship between the two variables in the relationship between political poverty and social participation with 95% confidence and just as the previous variable, the greater the social participation, the less political poverty .To interpret the degree of correlation between political poverty and physical participation is actually a positive correlation with the table below, and can be said to increase or decrease as physical poverty increases or decreases. There is a negative correlation between the status of political poverty and the attitude of participation as well as the first two variables, and the less the attitude of participation improves as political poverty is reduced. The coefficient of correlation also indicates a very strong relationship between political poverty and social participation (0.928) and a strong relationship between political poverty and physical participation (0.819) and attitude to participation (0.718) and a relatively strong relationship. Among political poverty and political participation (0.634(. Given these relationships, political-administrative institutions, including formal and informal policies, structures, processes, and processes, have a key role to play in implementing poverty reduction efforts .A very important relationship that should be addressed in relation to political poverty is participation, as a process by which people contribute and influence the development and decisions and resources that affect their lives. In this village, too, given the increased participation of people in rural affairs, the result is that political poverty is reduced.
Conclusion Today, the definition of poverty goes beyond income poverty and issues such as lack of access to education and health, equal opportunities, deprivation of personal and social capabilities, such as lack of political and social freedoms, lack of participation in institutions .Social and civil rights violations have spread .Participation in rural areas means organizing the interaction of the rural man with the geographical environment or optimal productivity at different levels of agricultural production .This has been done in the past through collective cooperation systems in various social, economic, and agricultural production areas .Today, in order to achieve the process of endogenous, self-reliant and sustainable rural development, a revision of the organization of cooperation in rural areas rooted in its geographical culture is inevitable .
Although there are many obstacles to the realization of the participation of rural people at the national level, they must be trusted in order to move forward with the goals. These problems include the lack of confidence of the villagers in the government, the unwillingness of rural youth to stay in the countryside and the high willingness to migrate to the city, the lack of awareness of rural education and participation programs. In the village, fate and fate are especially pointed out among the older generation .The present study can be considered to be somewhat consistent with the Quarterly Paper .In this paper, the role of participation planning in rural poverty reduction is studied qualitatively.
