مقايسه نمايه تن سنجي و كونيسيتي در دانشجويان مبتلا به سندروم پيش از قاعدگي با افراد سالم

Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome

ف: ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺐ ﺑﺪﻧﯽ و ﭼﺮﺑﯽ ﺑﺪن در اﻓﺮاد داراي ﺳﻨﺪروم ﭘﯿﺶ از ﻗﺎﻋﺪﮔﯽ در ﺑﺮوز و ﯾﺎ ﭘﯿﺸﮕﯿﺮي از ﺑﯿﻤﺎري ﻫﺎي ﻣﺰﻣﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي ﺗﻦ ﺳﻨﺠﯽ و ﮐﻮﻧﯿﺴﯿﺘﯽ در اﻓﺮاد ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻨﺪرم ﭘﯿﺶ از ﻗﺎﻋﺪﮔﯽ ﺑﺎ اﻓﺮاد ﺳﺎﻟﻢ اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪ. ﻣﻮاد و روشﻫﺎ: اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﯽ ﺑﺮ روي 92 داﻧﺸﺠﻮي دﺧﺘﺮ ﺳﺎﮐﻦ ﺧﻮاﺑﮕﺎه داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم ﭘﺰﺷﮑﯽ ﻣﺎزﻧﺪران داراي ﺳﻦ ﺑﺎﻻي 18 ﺳﺎل، در دو ﮔﺮوه ﺑﺎ ﺳﻨﺪروم ﭘﯿﺶ از ﻗﺎﻋﺪﮔﯽ و ﺳﺎﻟﻢ اﻧﺠﺎم ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي ﺗﻦ ﺳﻨﺠﯽ و ﮐﻮﻧﯿﺴﯿﺘﯽ در دو ﮔﺮوه اﻧﺪازه ﮔﯿﺮي و ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﺷﺪ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ: در اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ 46 ﻧﻔﺮ )54/8%( در ﮔﺮوه ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺑﻪ PMS ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺳﻨﯽ 22/02±1/51 ﺳﺎل و 38 ﻧﻔﺮ )45/2%( در ﮔﺮوه ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺳﻨﯽ 21/34±2/32 ﻗﺮارﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ آزﻣﻮن آﻣﺎري اﺧﺘﻼف ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري را ﺑﯿﻦ دو ﮔﺮوه ﻧﺸﺎن ﻧﺪاد )0/08=p(. در ﮔﺮوه PMS ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮوه ﺳﺎﻟﻢ، ﺑﻄﻮر ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري در ﺑﺴﺘﮕﺎن اﻧﻬﺎ اﯾﻦ اﺧﺘﻼل دﯾﺪه ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ)0/0001=p( و اﻟﺮژي ﻫﺎ و ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي ﺗﻦ ﺳﻨﺠﯽ در داﻧﺸﺠﻮﯾﺎن ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻨﺪروم ﻗﺎﻋﺪﮔﯽ ﺑﻄﻮر ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ از اﻓﺮاد ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﮔﺰارش ﺷﺪ )ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ، 0/003=p=0/001 ،p=0/01 ،p=0/02 ،p=0/0001 ،p=0/007 ،p( وﻟﯽ دو ﮔﺮوه از ﻧﻈﺮ ﮐﻮﻧﯿﺴﯿﺘﯽ ﺗﻔﺎوت آﻣﺎري ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري ﻧﺪاﺷﺘﻨﺪ. ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﮔﯿﺮي: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ اﻓﺮاد ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮوه ﺳﻨﺪروم ﻗﺒﻞ از ﻗﺎﻋﺪﮔﯽ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ اﻓﺮاد ﺳﺎﻟﻢ، ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي اﻧﺘﺮوﭘﻮﻣﺘﺮي ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮي دارﻧﺪ. اﻣﺎ از ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﮐﻮﻧﯿﺴﯿﺘﯽ ﺗﻔﺎوﺗﯽ ﻧﺪارﻧﺪ.

Body composition and body fat are important in the prevention of chronic diseases in people with premenstrual syndrome. This study was performed to compare the anthropometric and conicity indexes in PMS and healthy people. METHODS This cross-sectional study was performed on 92 dormitory students living in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences over 18 years of age in two groups with premenstrual syndrome and healthy subjects. Anthropometric and conicity parameters were measured and compared in two groups. FINDINGS In this study, 46 (54.8%) patients in the PMS group with an average age of 22.02±1.51 years and 38 (45.2%) in the healthy group with an average age of 21.34±2.32 that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the test (p=0.08). In the PMS group, this disorder was significantly different from that of the healthy group (p=0.0001), and the anger and allergies and anthropometric indices were significantly higher in students with menstrual syndrome than in healthy subjects (see The order of p=0.003, p=0.007, p=0.001, p= 0.02, p= 0.01, p= 0.001), but the two groups did not have a significant difference in terms of conicity. CONCLUSION The results of this study showed that subjects with premenstrual syndrome group had higher anthropometric indices than healthy subjects. But they do not differ in terms of conicity.