اين پژوهش با هدف پيش بيني خودكارآمدي در تصميم گيري شغلي براساس خلاقيت و سبك هاي تفكر انجام شد. پژوهش توصيفي و از نوع پيمايشي بود. جامعه آماري شامل تمامي دانشجويان سال آخر كارشناسي دانشكده ادبيات دانشگاه الزهراي تهران طي سال 98-1397 بود. با روش نمونه گيري تصادفي ساده تعداد 205 نفر انتخاب شدند. ابزارهاي پژوهش شامل چك ليست اطلاعات جمعيت شناختي-محقق ساخته، پرسشنامه خلاقيت، پرسشنامه سبك تفكر و پرسشنامه خودكارآمدي در تصيم گيري شغلي بود. داده هاي پژوهش با كمك روش هاي توصيفي (فراواني، درصد، ميانگين و انحراف معيار)، ضريب همبستگي پيرسون و تحليل رگرسيون چندمتغيره با روش ورود همزمان تحليل شد. نتايج نشان داد كه بين خلاقيت با خودكارآمدي در تصميم گيري شغلي رابطه معني داري وجود دارد (0/846=r و 0/05>P). رابطه بين سبك تفكر ارزشيابانه (0/671=r و 0/05>P) و سبك تفكر قانوان گذارانه (0/743=r و 0/05>P) با خودكارآمدي در تصميم گيري شغلي نيز معني دار بود؛ اما اين رابطه با متغير سبك تفكر اجرايي معني دار نبود (0/041-=r و 0/05
چكيده لاتين :
This study aimed to predict self-efficacy in career decision making based on creativity and thinking styles. The research was descriptive and survey. The statistical population consisted of all undergraduate students of the Faculty of Literature of Tehran's Alzahra University during the years 2018 –19. In this research 205 individuals were selected by simple random sampling. Research tools included a demographic-researcher-made checklist, creativity questionnaire, thinking style questionnaire, and self-efficacy questionnaire on job decision making. Research data were analyzed using descriptive methods (frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation), Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariate regression analysis with simultaneous logistic regression. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between creativity and self-efficacy in job decision making (r = 0.846, P <0.05).
The relationship between evaluative thinking style (r = 0.671, P <0.05) and legalistic thinking style (r = 0.743, P <0.05) with self-efficacy in job decision making were also significant, but this relationship was also significant. There was no significant difference with executive thinking style variable (r = -0 / 041, P <0.05). Also, regression analysis with concurrent admission showed that predictor variables together could not explain 38% of the changes related to self-efficacy in job decision making among students.