پديد آورندگان :
بيات پور، مريم دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد علوم و تحقيقات تهران - بخش تربيت بدني , شجاعي، معصومه دانشگاه الزهرا تهران - دانشكدهٔ تربيت بدني و علوم ورزشي - گروه رفتارحركتي , كاشي، علي پژوهشگاه تربيت بدني و علوم ورزشي تهران - گروه رفتارحركتي
كليدواژه :
اختلال هماهنگي رشدي , ادراك شايستگي حركتي , تمرين ذهني , مجموعهٔ آزمون ارزيابي حركت كودكان- 2
چكيده فارسي :
زمينه و هدف: 5تا6درصد از كودكان مقطع دبستان داراي اختلال هماهنگي رشدي هستند و تشخيص بهموقع و اتخاذ راهكارهاي حمايتي ضروري است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقايسهٔ تمرين منتخب ورزشي ذهني و تركيبي و نيز گزينش بهترين روش جهت رشد ادراك شايستگي حركتي پسران 9تا10سال داراي اين اختلال انجام شد.
روشبررسي: طرح پژوهش تجربي از نوع پيشآزمونپسآزمون با گروه گواه بود. 55 پسر 9تا10سالهٔ شيرازي توسط پرسشنامهٔ اختلال هماهنگي رشدي (كاپلان و همكاران، 2006) و مجموعهٔ آزمون ارزيابي حركت كودكان-2 (هندرسون ساگدن و بارنت، 2007) غربال شده و پس از همسانسازي شفافيت تصويرسازي ديداري (ماركس، 1973) و ادراك شايستگي جسماني (هارتر، 1985) بهشكل تصادفي ساده در سه گروه تجربي (14نفره) و يكگروه گواه (13نفره) قرار گرفتند. مداخلهٔ تمرين بدني و ذهني و تركيبي 24 جلسهٔ 45دقيقهاي برگزار شد. بهمنظور تحليل دادهها آزمون شاپيرو-ويلك جهت نرمالبودن توزيع متغيرهاي وابسته، آزمون تحليل كوواريانس با استفاده از پيشآزمون بهعنوان كووريت، آزمون تيهمبسته جهت ارزيابي اثر مداخله، آزمون لوين براي همگني واريانسها و آزمون بونفروني جهت آزمون تعقيبي بهكار رفت. نتايج با سطح معناداري 0٫05>p توسط نرمافزار آماري SPSS نسخهٔ 19 تحليل شد.
يافتهها: ميانگين ادراك شايستگي حركتي سه گروه تمرين ذهني و بدني و تركيبي در نوبت پسآزمون درمقايسه با پيشآزمون افزايش معناداري داشت (0٫001>p). تغييرپذيري نمرات ادراك شايستگي حركتي ناشياز اعمال متغير تمرين بدني 55صدم و ذهني 43صدم و تركيبي 73صدم بود.
نتيجهگيري: باتوجه به يافتههاي اين پژوهش در پسران 9تا10ساله، تمرين تركيبي بهترين شيوهٔ تمريني براي تسريع رشد ادراك شايستگي حركتي در كودكان داراي اختلال هماهنگي رشدي است.
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Objective: Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) affects 5–6% of school–aged children. Abrupt determination and adopt
a supportive strategy is necessarily. DCD not only influences in daily activities and educational function but also associated with poorer physical
health, fitness, psychological and social outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different types of selected training programs
(physical, mental and compound) to investigate the best intervention method in order to improve perceived motor competence in 9–10–year–old
children with developmental coordination disorder.
Methods: This study was an experimental, pre and post–test study with control group design. According to developmental coordination disorder
questionnaire (DCDQ–07) and movement assessment battery for children second edition (MABC–2), 55 school age (9–10–year–old) boys
diagnosed to have developmental coordination disorder. The children were randomly grouped in four experimental groups, 3 training
interventions groups (physical, mental and compound) (n=14) and the control group (n=13). Visual vividness and physical self–perception
determined by visual vividness questionnaire (VVQ) and Harter scale respectively. Training programs involved 24 sessions of 45 minutes for
each of them. The programs consist of selected physical, mental and compound trainings, which respectively conducted in groups and
individually. Compound group was given different training order in turn (physical+mental and vice versa) and control group was not assigned
to any intervention. In order to modify cognitive and arousal effects induced by training order counterbalance method was recruited. All measures
were administered pre and post an 8–week, 3 times a week to identify the changes in physical self–perception associated with trainings. To detect
differences between the pre– and post–test, after making sure of normal distribution of data utilizing Shapiro–Wilks normality test and Levene’s
test, Ancova and paired sample T–Test were conducted to calculate equality of variances and Post hoc comparisons were followed by Bonfrroni
test (set at 0.05). Effect size was calculated to determine the practical significance of statistical difference (p<0.05). All data were analyzed using
SPSS–19 for windows.
Results: The results showed that all 3 training groups (mental, physical and compound) indicates significant improvement (p<0.001) in motor
perception from pre–test to post–test. Within group comparisons implies that compound training significantly (p<0.05) caused more effect than
the others. As well as statistical, this positive improvement also showed a large practical significance (d=0.43), (d=0.55), (d=0.73) in mental,
physical and compound groups respectively after the intervention period.
Conclusion: The result determines significant improvement in physical self– perception that can be fulfilled by using physical and mental
trainings for 9–10–year–old boys who have developmental coordination disorder, and compound training might be the most effective way to
facilitate motor development in DCD children. It is important to remember that the motor competence and self–concept of children are two
important components of their total well– beings, which seemed to be interlinked from young age. When they experience problem such as those
indicate for DCD, specific intervention seems to be necessary in order to optimally improve these aspects. This study might help to develop
training protocol for DCD children based on more documents, which improve our knowledge of perceived competence from both physical and
mental trainings functions that would be beneficial for DCD children and therapists.