زمينه و هدف: معناشناسي يكي از جنبههاي بسيار مهم زبان است كه رشد آن در افراد كمشنواي شديد و عميق به تأخير ميافتد. ناشنواياني كه واژگان بيشتري را ميدانند، بهتر ميتوانند با مخاطبان خود ارتباط برقرار كنند و درك صحيحتري از معناي جملات گفتاري و نوشتاري ديگران داشته باشند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ساخت و تعيين روايي و پايايي آزمون معنايي در بزرگسالان با افتشنوايي شديد و عميق، انجام شد.
روش بررسي: ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ اﻳﻦ آزﻣﻮن اﺑﺘﺪا ليستي از واژهﻫﺎ، ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺑﺮ 120 واژه از واژﮔﺎن پربسامد ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ بزرگسالان داراي مدرك ديپلم و بالاتر، اﻧﺘﺨﺎب شد و سپس هر واژهٔ مورد نظر براي هممعنايي بيشتر در بافت جمله آورده شد. آنگاه چند گزينه براساس قواعد هالادينا انتخاب شد. براي بررسي روايي محتوايي سؤالات، از صاحبنظران كمك گرفته شد كه در نهايت 44 سؤال باقي ماند. آزمون ساختهشده روي 35 فرد (19 دختر و 16 پسر) با افت شنوايي شديد و عميق در مقاطع تحصيلي ديپلم، فوقديپلم و ليسانس انجام شد و 35 فرد نيز با ﺷﻨﻮايي طبيعي به ﻋﻨﻮان ﮔﺮوه ﺷﺎﻫﺪ در نظر گرفته شد.
يافتهها: ميانگين كلي شاخص و نسبت روايي محتوايي بهترتيب 0٫923 و 1+ به دست آمد. در بررسي پايايي، مقدار آلفاي كرونباخ معادل 0٫918 به دست آمد. در بررسي تكرارپذيري آزمون، رابطه معنادار بدست آمد (0٫893=، 0٫001
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Objective: Semantics is one of the most important aspects of language acquisition the development of which maybe deviated
in severe and profound hearing-impaired. The more words Deaf learned, the better they can communicate with their audience and understand
the correct meaning of spoken and written messages of others. This study reports on the development of a lexical-semantic test and investigates
its validity and reliability in adults with severe to profound hearing loss.
Methods: For the development of the test, a list of high frequency words including 120 words appropriate for literate adults was gathered. Then
each word was placed in a sentence context for the purpose of contextualization. Afterwards, some choices were selected according to Haladyna
rules. Content validity was assessed according to experts’ ratings and finally 44 questions remained. The test was administered to 35 participants
(19 females and 16 males) with severe to profound hearing loss with school diploma, upper diploma and Bachelor of Science, while a group of
35 participants with normal hearing was considered as the control group.
Results: The overall average of content validity ratio and index were obtained respectively +1 and 0.923. Cronbach's alpha value was equal to
0.918. In correlation between test-retest scores, there was a positive significant correlation between the scores (r=0.893, p<0.001). Hearing
impaired girls’ mean score in comparison with boys’ was significantly higher (p<0.001). There were significant differences in the different
educational levels (p= 0.032).
Conclusion: The test enjoyed high reliability and validity indices. The mean score of the girls was more than that of the boys. The higher the
level of education of hearing impaired persons, the higher their performance on the lexical-semantic test.