چكيده لاتين :
Introduction
The emergence of the city as the second largest revolution in human culture is a prominent
social phenomenon that has brought about a change in the interactions of human beings with
each other. Therefore, the beginning of urbanization, considered as a turning point in the social
history of Human beings. As the world's population is on the rise, urban spatial distribution is
increasingly imbalanced by the massive migrations of rural communities in favor of cities. This
causes deep concern at the global and national levels. Urban development, especially postWorld War II events, has hit many cities with problems such as increased travel with vehicles,
inadequate services, reduced air quality, environmental degradation, discrimination in land use,
etc. The formation, growth and expansion of the concept of quality of life over the past half
century has made it a key and important concept in the field of global issues and human issues,
which today, along with the concepts of sustainable development, the concept of quality of life
has been raised. This concept is one of the most important dimensions for maintaining any
urban development. Quality of life is a complex, multidimensional, relative concept influenced
by time and space and individual and social values that are used for different purposes in
various research. The desire to improve the quality of life in a particular location or a particular
person or group is important for planners. The history of the emergence of the concept of
quality of life in the days of Aristotle dates back to 385 BC. At that time, Aristotle considered
"good life" or " good doing of things" as being happy. The use of this concept in the past, based
on the per capita income indicator, is in fact a reaction, against one-dimensional economic
development at the national level and purely urban-scale physical development. and an attempt
In order to achieve more comprehensive and multidimensional criteria in planning Arena.
Academically, the concept of quality of life was introduced as a research ground since the early
1960s. The report of the US Presidential Committee on the National Goals and the research
work of Bauer (1966) on the secondary effects of environmental programs in the United States
are commonly referred to as the first things that have been a pioneer in the quality of life debate.
Methodology
Current study is applied and based on its nature is analytical- descriptive. First through library
study (Books, documents, dissertations, satellite imagery and the Internet) collected theories and
documentation, then, observing and collecting the required information in the research and
using the questionnaire. In order to get better answers and refer back to the statistical sample,
this questionnaire is a family type. Based on the Population and Housing Census of Zanjan city
2011, There are 3820 households in the Karmandan Neighborhood as a Planned neighborhood,
and 8737 households in Islamabad as an informal settlement neighborhood. Based on Cochran
Model Sampling, 288 samples are estimated for neighborhoods. Finally, for the test From
Topsis Decision Making Models and analytical hierarchy, Independent T tests and path analysis
In order to analyze the significant impact of indicators on quality of life in the studied
neighborhoods, has been used. To measure the Effect of Different Factors on Urban Quality
used 4 main social, cultural and religious, economic and environmental indexes and 24 indicator
using paired sample test.
Results and Discussion
Path analysis was used to measure the significant effect of indexes. At first direct and Indirect
Impact of indexes on total Quality of Life, and then the effect of the indexes relative to each
other is examined according to the obtained value.
In the study of indexes Relative to Quality of Life, Physical index with 0.584, social, cultural
and religious index with 0.390, economic index with 0.286 and environmental index with 0.451
Affect Total quality of life. In the next step, the indirect effect of indexes relative to each other
and finally on the total quality of life , physical index with 0.329, the social, cultural and
religious index with 0.096, the economic index with 0.068 and the environmental index with
zero have an indirect effect on the quality of life. Considering sum of direct and indirect effects
of indicators on total quality of life the physical index with 0.913, the social index with 0.586,
the environmental index with 0.451 and the economic index with 0.345 have the most to the
least effect on the quality of life in the studied neighborhoods. Meanwhile, the effect of the body
index is significant.
Conclusion
Finally, it can be said that quality of life in urban environments is a multidimensional concept,
and various criteria and indicators should be considered in order to promote it. In the study area
In terms of residents, physical index has the greatest impact on quality of life, and other
indicators have had less impact. Therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention to other
indicators, such as environmentalists, in order to improve the quality of life.
