نگاهي تحليلي - تطبيقي به تمثيل از ديدگاه قندزي و بلاغت نويسان قبل و بعد وي

An Analytical – Research look into allegory from the viewpoint of Ghondozi and the eloquence writers before and after him

تمثيل از انواع ادبي است كه كاربردي ديرينه دارد و بلاغت نويسان از گذشته هاي دور تاكنون درباره آن نظرات گوناگون و متفاوتي ارائه كرده اند. يكي از اين بلاغت نويسان محمود بن محمد بن احمد قندزي، اديب ايراني قرن نهم هجري و نويسنده اثري به نام بلاغت است. از اين رو در پژوهش حاضر سعي بر اين است كه تمثيل از نگاه قندزي و ديگر بلاغت نويسان معاصر و كلاسيك بررسي و مقايسه شود. براي رسيدن به اين منظور پس از معرفي قندزي و اثر ايشان، تمثيل از نگاه قندزي بررسي و با آراي بلاغت نويسان قبل و بعد از او مقايسه شد و وجوه افتراق و اشتراك آن ها در جدولي مشخص گرديد. حاصل پژوهش حاضر كه به شيوه اسنادي-تحليلي انجام گرفته، بيانگر اين است كه آراي قندزي به بلاغت نويسان گذشته نزديك تر است و اساس نظريات قندزي و نويسندگان پس از او بر پايه عقايد گذشتگان است.

An allegory is a kind of literary genre with a long-standing application; and the eloquence writers since the far pasts have presented a variety of different opinions about it. One of these eloquence writersis Mahmood-ibn-e- Mohammad-ibn-e Ahmad Ghondozi – an Iranian scholarin in the 9th Hijri century and he is also the writer of a work called “eloquence”. Therefore, the present research tries to study and compare the allegory from the viewpoints of Ghondozi and other contemporary and classic eloquence writers of before and after he himself. To achieve this, after introducing the Ghondozi and his work, allegory was studied from the viewpoints of Ghondozi and was compared with the opinions of eloquence writers of before and after him; and their differentiation and common moods were determined in the table. The result of the present study that has been carried out using the documentary-analytical method indicates that Ghondozi’s views are closer to those of the past eloquence writers; and the basis of Ghondoizi’s ideas and his subsequent writers is based on the basis of the believes of past ones.