اﺑﺘﮑﺎر ﯾﮏ ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ ﯾﮏراه، ﻧﻬﺎدﮔﺮاﯾﯽ و دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي ﭼﯿﻦ ﺑ

دو دﻫﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ، دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي ﭼﯿﻦ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﻋﺖ در ﺣﺎل ﺗﻐﯿﺮ و ﮔﺴﺘﺮش اﺳﺖ و ﺗﺤﻮﻻت ژﺋﻮﭘﻠﯿﺘﯿﮑﯽ ﺟﺪﯾﺪ و اﺳﺘﻘﺮار رژﯾﻢﻫﺎي ﺑﯿﻦاﻟﻤﻠﻠﯽ، دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي اﯾﻦ ﮐﺸﻮر را ﺗﻘﻮﯾﺖ ﮐﺮده اﺳﺖ. ﻫﺪف اﺻﻠﯽ اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻧﻘﺶ، ﻣﺤﺘﻮا و اﻫﻤﯿﺖ ﺗﺪارﮐﺎت ﻧﻬﺎدي ﭼﯿﻦ و ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎي آن ﺑﺮ دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي اﯾﻦ ﮐﺸﻮر در راﺳﺘﺎي ﺗﺴﻬﯿﻞ روﻧﺪ واﺑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي و اراﺋﻪ ﭼﺸﻢاﻧﺪازي از اﻫﺪاف ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺮوازاﻧﻪي ﭘﮑﻦ در ﺑﺨﺶ اﻧﺮژي اﺳﺖ. ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ اﺗﮑﺎ ﺑﻪ روش ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ-ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ و ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪاي درﺻﺪد ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ اﯾﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ رژﯾﻢﺳﺎزي ﺑﯿﻦاﻟﻤﻠﻠﯽ ﺟﺪﯾﺪ ﭼﯿﻦ در ﭼﺎرﭼﻮب اﺑﺘﮑﺎر (ﯾﮏ ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ ﯾﮏراه) ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ در راﺳﺘﺎي اﻫﺪاف دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي اﯾﻦ ﮐﺸﻮر ﻗﺮارﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ؟ ﻓﺮﺿﯿﻪ ﻣﻮرد آزﻣﻮن ﺑﺎ اﺗﮑﺎ ﺑﻪ آﻣﻮزهﻫﺎي ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﻧﻬﺎدﮔﺮاﯾﯽ ﻧﻮﻟﯿﺒﺮال اﯾﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ اﯾﻦ اﺑﺘﮑﺎر ﺿﻤﻦ اﻓﺰاﯾﺶ اﻋﺘﺒﺎر ﺑﯿﻦاﻟﻤﻠﻠﯽ و ﻣﺸﺮوﻋﯿﺖ ﺳﺎزﻣﺎﻧﯽ ﭘﮑﻦ در راﺳﺘﺎي ﺗﺴﻬﯿﻞ روﻧﺪ واﺑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي، دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي اﯾﻦ ﮐﺸﻮر را از ﻃﺮﯾﻖ اﯾﺠﺎد ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎي ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪﮔﺬاري ﺟﺪﯾﺪ و ارﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎت ﻓﺰاﯾﻨﺪه درزﻣﯿﻨﮥ اﻧﺮژي و ﺗﺠﺎرت ﺗﻘﻮﯾﺖ ﮐﺮده اﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ، ﭘﮑﻦ ﺑﺎ اﺗﮑﺎ ﺑﻪ اﯾﻦ اﺑﺘﮑﺎر، ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻘﻮﯾﺖ دﯾﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﯽ اﻧﺮژي ﺧﻮد، ﻣﻌﻤﺎري ﻧﻮﯾﻦ ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ اﻧﺮژي و اﻧﺘﻘﺎل ﺧﻮد ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎم ﻧﻈﺎرﺗﯽ ﺑﯿﻦاﻟﻤﻠﻠﯽ را در ﻧﻈﺮ دارد.

Over the past two decades, China's energy diplomacy is rapidly changing and expanding. The rise of China and the Economic Growth have led to that this country to made great efforts to conserve energy resources and its security. However, recent geopolitical developments, such as the establishment of China’s new international institutions, have reinvigorated the field of China’s energy diplomacy. The purpose of this paper is the analysis the role, content, scope and importance of China's institutional procurement and identify some of its consequences on China's energy diplomacy to facilitating economic interdependence and Beijing's goals in the energy sector. The main question is how does China’s new international regimes (One Belt One Road Initiative) complement China’s energy diplomacy? By using Neo-Liberal Institutionalism theory this essay will show that China’s new international institutions are successful complements to China’s energy diplomacy, hence they provide China with institutional legitimacy, which increases its energy trade and investment opportunities and the most important consequence is creating a New World Order for Global Energy Governance.