رفتارهاي اطلاع يابي در پژوهش هاي علوم اسلامي: مورد پژوهي در حوزه هاي علميه

Information seeking behavior in Islamic Science Researches: A Case Study on Seminary

اﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ روش ﻫﺎي ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﺗﺎ روﯾﺎروﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ اﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﯽ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎي ﻣﺪل اﻟﯿﺲ در ﺣﻮزه ﻫﺎي ﻋﻠﻤﯿﻪ، ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ 323 ﻃﻠﺒﻪ اﺳﺘﺎن ﻓﺎرس و اﺳﺘﺎن ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﯽ ﭘﺮدازد. روش ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ: روش ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎر رﻓﺘﻪ، ﭘﯿﻤﺎﯾﺸﯽ و ﮔﺮدآوري داده ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮاي ﺳﻨﺠﺶ رواﯾﯽ، از رواﯾـﯽ ﺻـﻮري و ﺑﺮاي ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ، از ﺿﺮﯾﺐ آﻟﻔﺎي ﮐﺮﻧﺒﺎخ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ. داده ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از روش ﻫﺎي آﻣﺎر اﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﯽ و آزﻣﻮن ﻫﺎي ﻧﺎ ﭘﺎراﻣﺘﺮﯾـ ﮏ )آزﻣـﻮن ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻣﻦ و ﮐﺮاﺳﮑﺎل واﻟﯿﺲ( و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ اﺳﭙﯿﺮﻣﻨﺘﺠﺰﯾﻪ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ: ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﯽ ﮐﻪ ذﻫﻦ درﺑﺎره آن ﮐﻨﺠﮑﺎو اﺳﺖ )2/6(، ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ اﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﯽ )3/13(، ﻣﺮور ﺳﺎﯾﺖ ﻫﺎي اﯾﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﯽ و ﺷﺒﮑﻪ ﻫـﺎ ي اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮع )3/92(، اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﭘﺎﯾﮕﺎه ﻫﺎي اﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﯽ )3/48(، ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺑﻮدن )3/7(، ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﭼﮑﯿـﺪه ﯾـﺎ ﺧﻼﺻـﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﯾـﺎ ﮐﺘـﺎب )2/48(، ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ، ﺗﺸﺨﯿﺺ ﻧﯿﺎز اﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﯽ، ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ، ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ، ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ، روﯾﺎروﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ اﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﯽ، ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﻃﻼب در اوﻟﻮﯾﺖ اول ﻗﺮار ﻣﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﻧﺪ. ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﮔﯿﺮي: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺣﺎﮐﯽ از آن اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻃﻼب ﺣﻮزه ﻫﺎي ﻋﻠﻤﯿﻪ اﺳﺘﺎن ﻓﺎرس و اﺳﺘﺎن ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ از ﻣﯿﺎن روش ﻫﺎي اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﺗﺎ روش ﻫﺎي روﯾﺎروﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ اﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﯽ از ﻣﺪل اﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪارد رﻓﺘﺎر اﻃﻼع ﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﺗﺒﻌﯿﺖ ﻧﮑﺮده و ﻣﯿﺰان ﭘﯿﺮوي ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﯾﺎن از ﻣﺮاﺣﻞ رﻓﺘﺎر اﻃﻼع ﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﮐﻢ اﺳﺖ.

This paper aims to survey the method of Selecting subject to coping with Information Resources based on the Ellis model in Seminary, study 323 Students in Fars and Bushehr Province. Methods The method of this study is a survey with analytical approach. Data collection tools in this study was questionnaire and in order to assess validity (content), and the questionnaire reliability was obtained by Cronbach alpha. Sampling is purposeful; Descriptive and analytical statistical methods such as Spearman'scor-relation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests were utilized. Results prying mind(2/6), reviewing of information resources (3/13), Sites in the Internet related to subjects orsocial networks (3/92), Using online databasesor weblogs (3/48), Authority (3/7), Studying abstract (2/48),is soimportant for seminary students. Conclusion The results showed that Students of Seminary selected different methods that selected by research population for Selecting subject to coping with Information Resources and its not based on the Ellis Mode