ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﯿﺰان ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺪاﻟﺖ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در دوﻟﺖ ﻫﺎي ﭘﺲ از اﻧﻘﻼب ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس اﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪ اﻣﺎم ﺧﻤﯿﻨﯽ (ره)(1392-1368)

A Survey of the Level of fullfilment of Social Justice in Post-Revolutionary States Based on Imam Khomeini's (RA) Thought (1989-2013)

نظام جمهوري اسلامي به عنوان نظام برخاسته از خواست و اراده مردم داراي مسايل مخصوص به خود است كه از آن جمله، نسبت بين اجراي عدالت درانديشه بنيان گذار آن و تلاش دولت هايي است كه در اين راستا اقداماتي را انجام داده اند. از طرفي يكي از ابهاماتي كه در مورد تحقق عدالت در انديشه امام خميني (ره) وجود دارد اين است كه از نظر ايشان چه نوع عدالتي بايد ايجاد گردد و شاخصه هاي آن چيست؟ به منظور پاسخ دادن به اين مسأله در قالب پژوهشي كمي وكيفي و با بهره گيري از چارچوبي تحليلي-توصيفي، بر ديدگاه امام خميني (ره) در مورد عدالت تآكيد شد. بر همين اساس متغير عدالت اجتماعي در انديشه امام خميني (ره) در سه دولت هاشمي، خاتمي و احمدي نژاد به عنوان نمونه مورد بررسي قرار گرفت. شاخص اين ارزيابي ها؛ در بخش عدالت اجتماعي: كاهش فاصله طبقاتي و بهره مندي از امكانات بود. در مقاله حاضر اين نتيجه حاصل شد كه دولت هاي مذكور اگرچه خود را مديون انديشه امام خميني (ره) مي دانستند و تلاش نمودند در برنامه هاي توسعه اي و عملكردي خود به موضوع عدالت اجتماعي بپردازند، اما به دليل وجود موانع ساختاري و اجرايي در اجراي عدالت اجتماعي چندان موفق نبودند.

The system of the Islamic Republic as a system originates from people's will have their own problems Including: the ratio between the implementation of justice in its founder's minds and the efforts of governments that have taken steps in this direction. On the other hand, one of the uncertainties regarding the realization of justice in the thought of Imam Khomeini (RA) is this What kind of justice should be created in his opinion and what are its characteristics? In order to answer this question in the form of quantitative and qualitative research using the analytical-descriptive framework, Imam Khomeini's view on justice was made clear. Accordingly, the social justice variable in the thought of Imam Khomeini (RA) was considered as an example in the three Hashemi, Khatami and Ahmadinejad governments. The indicator of these assessments; in the social justice section: the reduction of class gap and the use of facilities. In the present article, it was concluded that these governments, although they owe their views to Imam Khomeini's (ra) an‎d attempted to address social justice in their developmental and functional programs, But they did not succeed because of the structural and executive barriers to social justice. Mr. Hashemi's government was seeking to expand economic development, and so, while considering social justice in the development plan, it was actually marginalized in practice. Social justice in Mr. Khatami's government was not the main reason of the government but political development was the ultimate symbol of justice. Also in the presence of Mr. Ahmadinejad, although social justice constituted the fundamental discourse of the government but in practice it did not succeed as a fundamental symbol of justice.