عنوان مقاله :
تحليل مولفه ها و سازوكارهاي نشانه - معنايي دخيل در شكل گيري مفهوم «ترديد» در گفتمان ادبي (مطالعه موردي رمان انگار گفته بودي ليلي اثر سپيده شاملو)
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Analyzing Semio-discursive Components of the Notion of Doubt in Literary Discourse: The Case Study of “ As You had Told Leyli” by Sepideh Shamlou
پديد آورندگان :
رضائي، رضا دانشگاه ياسوج - گروه زبان و ادبيات انگليسي، ياسوج
كليدواژه :
نشانه معناشناسي , ترديد روايي , گفتمان تنشي بوشي , سپيده شاملو
چكيده فارسي :
جستار پيش رو مي كوشد تا با اتكا بر رويكرد نشانه معناشناسي به تحليل گفتمان ادبي و سازوكارهاي نشانه معناشناختي «ترديد» در گفتمان ادبي رمان انگار گفته بودي ليلي اثر سپيده شاملو بپردازد. روش تحقيق توصيفي تحليلي است. درواقع، نگارنده سعي دارد تا با تكيه بر گفتمان ادبي شاملو و فرم روايي منحصربه فرد آن به شيوه تحليل نشانه معناشناختي نشان دهد چگونه «ترديد» در بطن گفتمان رمان شكل گرفته و فرايند توليد و دريافت معنا را تحت تاثير قرار مي دهد. هدف اصلي جستار پيش رو پاسخ گويي به پرسش هاي زير است :1. مولفه ها و سازوكارهاي نشانه معنايي و گفتماني دخيل در شكل گيري «ترديد» در بطن روايت ادبي كدام اند و چه ويژگي هايي دارند؟ 2. مولفه هاي روايي و نشانه معنايي «ترديد» در كليت نظام گفتماني اثر مورد مطالعه چه كاركردهايي دارند؟ نتايج نشان دادند كه ترديد روايي برونداد مولفه هاي تنشي و بوشي گفتمان است كه به نوبه خود كنش روايي را از طريق برهم ريختن نظم و ايجاد آشفتگي در افعال موثر به حاشيه رانده و با سبك هاي حضور نشانه معناشناختي پيوندي تنگاتنگ دارد. با لحاظ مولفه هاي نشانه معنايي ترديد و نوع حضور سوژه در اين اثر، ترديد به شكل گيري گفتماني مي انجامد كه داراي كاركردي سلبي [1] و مبتني بر سقوط است.
چكيده لاتين :
The current research aims to analyze and classify the semio-discursive
components of Narrative “doubt” in the discursive system of “As you had
told Leyli” – the novel by Sepideh shamloo- one of the writers of Persian
fourth generation fictional generation. Research methodology is descriptive
–analytical. In fact, the authors seeks to explain for the first time the
underlying semio-discursive components of “doubt “in literary discourse by
relying on the theoretical framework of post –Gremassian semiotics in order
to show how the notion of “doubt “ emerges in the literary discourse and
affects the process of meaning production and perception. To this end, the
main objective of the present research is to answer the following questions:
1. what are the main semio-discursive components of “doubt” in literary
discourse? 2. What are the major narrative and semio-discursive functions of
“doubt” in the whole discursive system of the novel? It can conclude that in
semiotic analysis of “As you had told Leyli” two main actants of the novel
(Mastaneh –Sharareh) enter in competition with each other for the concept of
love. This competition results in the interplay of negation and affirmation at
the heart of semio-discursive system of the novel. As seen throughout the
current research, by highlighting the Leyli’s scheme, the writer tries to
challenge the narrators / enunciators affective states throughout the history
of the novel. The main thematic of this story which is doubt is the central
and main narrative program of the novel. Neither Mastaneh nor Sharareh can
approach to Leyli’s scheme. In fact, in this work discursive tension
sometimes leads to discursive action (here Mastaneh’s suicide) and sometimes to negate it. It is worth mentioning that the marginalized narrative
action casts doubt on Leyli’s scheme and in this step Sharareh loses her
modal competence and is concerned with modal verbs turbulence. The
enunciator who has the virtual semiotic presence till the end of narrative.
Undoubtedly, this novel presents a semio-discursive paradigm whose main
feature is “doubt”. In this novel, discursive action has the secondary function
and is based on thymic (the interaction, multiplication and turbulence of
modal constituents), tensive and existential components of discourse which
are highly under the influence of negative functions. Consequently, none of
the enunciators/ narrators can never retrieve their actual presence. The
results showed that narrative doubt is as a result of tensive and existential
components of discourse which marginalizes in its own turn the narrative
action and has the close relationship with all the styles of semiotic presence
whose meaning is based on negation and fall and affects the process of
meaning production and perception.
عنوان نشريه :
جستارهاي زباني