نقد و بررسي شبهه ي كراهت ازدواج

Critique of the suspicion of hatred of marriage

اﻣﺎﻣﯿﻪ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻨﺎد ﺑﻪ اﻃﻼق ﯾﺎ ﻋﻤﻮم ادﻟﻪ اي ﮐﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻪ اﺳﺘﺤﺒﺎب ازدواج دارﻧﺪ، ﮔﺴﺘﺮه ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﯿﻦ را آﺣﺎد ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن ﻣﯽ داﻧﻨﺪ. در ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ، ﮔﺮوﻫﯽ از ﺑﺰرﮔﺎن ﻓﻘﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮي)ع( ﻫﻤﭽﻮن ﺷﯿﺦ ﻃﻮﺳﯽ، اﺑﻦ ﺣﻤﺰه، راوﻧﺪي و ﺣﻠﯽ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻨﺎد ﺑﻪ ادﻟﻪ اي ﻧﻈﯿﺮ ﺳﺘﺎﯾﺶ ﺣﻀﺮت ﯾﺤﯿﯽ)ع( در ﻗﺮآن ﮐﺮﯾﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮان » ﺣﺼﻮر«، ﻣﺬﻣﺖ ﻣﺤﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮزﻧﺪان و زﻧﺎن، در ﭘﯽ داﺷﺘﻦ ﻓﺘﻨﻪ، ﺣﺰن و اﻧﺪوه و اﯾﺠﺎد اﻧﺤﺮاف از آرﻣﺎن اﺻﻠﯽ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﮐﻪ ازدواج ﻋﺎﻣﻞ اﯾﺠﺎد آن اﺳﺖ، ﺑﺮ اﯾﻦ ﺑﺎورﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ اﺳﺘﺤﺒﺎب ازدواج اﺧﺘﺼﺎص ﺑﻪ دو ﮔﺮوه دارد؛ اول: ﮐﺴﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺗﻤﮑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﺮاي ﻓﺮاﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻮدن ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎت ازدواج را دارا ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ و ﮔﺮوه دوم: ﮐﺴﺎﻧﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺷﻮق ﺟﻨﺴﯽ ﺑﻪ رواﺑﻂ زﻧﺎﺷﻮﯾﯽ دارﻧﺪ و در ﻏﯿﺮ اﯾﻦ دو ﻣﻮرد، ازدواج ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﯿﺘﯽ ﻧﺪارد ﺑﻠﮑﻪ ﻣﮑﺮوه ﻧﯿﺰ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ و ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﺧﻮﯾﺸﺘﻦ داري ﻧﻤﻮد. در اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ ادﻟﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎن، ﺑﺎ اﺳــﺘﻨﺎد ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻮم ادﻟﻪ ﻧﻘﻠﯽ ﻣﺸــﺮوﻋﯿﺖ ﻧﮑﺎح و ادﻟﻪ ﻋﻘﻠﯽ ﻧﻈﯿﺮ وﺟﻮب ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ واﺟﺐ و ﻣﻼزﻣﻪ ﻣﯿﺎن ﺣﮑﻢ ﻋﻘﻞ و ﺷﺮع، ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﯿﺖ اﺳﺘﺤﺒﺎﺑﯽ ﻧﮑﺎح اﺛﺒﺎت ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ

Well-known Imami jurists, citing the absolute or general arguments that are in favor of marriage, consider the audience to be Muslims. On the other hand, a group of great jurists of Jafari (AS) such as Sheikh Tusi, Ibn Hamza, Ravandi and Hali, citing arguments such as praising Hazrat Yahya (AS) in the Holy Quran as "Hasour", condemning the love of children and women, in Following sedition, sorrow and grief and deviating from the main ideal of creation, which is caused by marriage believed that the acceptance of marriage belongs to two groups; First: those who have the financial means to prepare for marriage and the second group, those who have sexual desire for marital relations, and otherwise, marriage is not only undesirable but also disgusting and should be restrained. In this study, while criticizing the arguments of the opponents, citing the general narrated arguments of the legitimacy of marriage and rational arguments such as the necessity of the obligatory introduction and the connection between the rule of reason and sharia, the desirability of marriage has been proved.