بررسي پايداري مناطق مختلف شهركرمانشاه با رويكرد توسعه پايدار

Assessment of urban areas sustainability, Case study: Kermanshah, Iran

زﻣﯿﻨﻪ و ﻫﺪف: ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺪار ﺗﻌﺎدل ﺑﯿﻦ اﺑﻌﺎد ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي، اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ و زﯾﺴﺖ ﻣﺤﯿﻄﯽ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻫﺪف آن ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﺷﺮاﯾﻂ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ اﻧﺴﺎن ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻫﺪف از اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﺶ ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﮐﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎه ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﯾﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺪار ﺷﻬﺮي ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. روش ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ: ﻧﻮع ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﮐﺎرﺑﺮدي و روش ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ آن ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ -ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ اﺳﺖ. در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺷﻬﺮﮐﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎه ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺳﻪ روش ELECTRE ،SAW و TOPSIS در ﺗﻠﻔﯿﻖ ﺑﺎ روش Shannon's entropy و ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮه ﮔﯿﺮي از 44 ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ در ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺪار ﺷﻬﺮي و در ﻧﺮم اﻓﺰارﻫﺎي Electre, Topsis, Excel, Shannon's entropy, Spss در ﺳﺎل 1396 ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﮐﯽ از آن اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ در ﻫﺮ ﺳﻪ روش ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎر ﺑﺮده ﺷﺪه، ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 4 و 1 از ﭘﺎﯾﺪاري ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮي ﺑﺮﺧﻮردار ﺑﻮده اﻧﺪ. در ﺣﺎﻟﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 3 و 2 ﭘﺎﯾﺪاري ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ و ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 5 و 6 ﭘﺎﯾﺪاري ﮐﻤﺘﺮي را ﻧﺸﺎن داده اﻧﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ از آزﻣﻮن ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻣﻦ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽ دﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ در رﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﻨﺪي ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﻬﺮي، ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري ﺑﯿﻦ ﺳﻪ ﻣﺪل ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎر ﺑﺮده ﺷﺪه وﺟﻮد ﻧﺪارد. ﺑﺤﺚ و ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﮔﯿﺮي: ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ از اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﻣﯿﺰان ﺑﺮﺧﻮرداري ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ از ﺧﺪﻣﺎت و اﻣﮑﺎﻧﺎت ﺷﻬﺮي ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﯾﮑﺴﺎن ﻧﻤﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ ﺑﺮﻗﺮاري ارﺗﺒﺎط ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺷﺶ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﮐﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎه ﺑﺮاي ﻧﯿﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺪار ﺿﺮوري ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﯽ رﺳﺪ.

Background and Objective: sustainable development is the balance between various economic, social and environmental aspects which aims at improving the quality of human life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the six different areas of Kermanshah city based on urban sustainable development indicators. Method: The research is applied and its method is descriptive-analytical. The level of development of different areas of Kermanshah has been studied using three methods, SAW, ELECTRE and TOPSIS in conjunction with Shannon's entropy and enjoying 44 effective indices in sustainable urban development as well as ELECTRE, TOPSIS, Excel, Shannon's entropy, SPSS soft wares. Findings: The results of this study indicate that in all three methods, 1 and 4 districts showed a higher stability. While areas 2 and 3 had an average sustainability and areas 5 and 6 showed less sustainability. Friedman's test results show that there is no significant difference among the three models in ranking the urban areas. Discussion and Conclusion: Given the results of this study, the level of urban services and amenities is not the same in different areas. So establishing a harmonious relationship among the six areas of Kermanshah to achieve sustainable development seems necessary.